You Aren’t Who You Think You Are, When Twitter Tells You “Blockchain All the Way”

in twitter •  3 months ago

As recently re-emphasized by former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, he of 9/11 fame, we nowadays live in an era of Truth isn’t Truth.

As most of us know, social media has vastly contributed to the sentiment of not correct news and the propagation of such.

Sadly enough, I recently got to taste a piece of that same cake. In an impersonal yet rather personal way.

But in a slightly different format.


Looking at the screenshot above, I doubt there’s anybody who will think that is a suspicious account. Other than the account being created in 2011, it seems to be a Twitter account for @steemobserver, a web property also based over at its own url.

Twitter Is Here to Save the Day

Alas... that is not what the algos or fact checkers over at Twitter, a centralized social media property, think.

This morning, doing my usual way too long short coffee waking session, I was checking zeh Titter for interesting Steem links. When something caught my eye, I wanted to share the link via a retweet on @steemobserver - the Twitter account that is. Much to my surprise it seemed the account had been suspended for “violating twitter policies”.

Anybody who has spent some time online knows about false positives and that even the smartest algo can make an error. While still under-caffeinated, I didn’t think much of it and launched a suspension appeal. After all, as far as I can recall, I don’t use social media when drunk and thus it is highly unimaginable that I would have violated Twitter’s guidelines.

I haven’t done so with any social media account I have had (my original Twitter is more than 10 years old) and I doubt I would suddenly do anything offending online. Just a false positive, I thought and soon all will be fixed and I could retweet interesting Steem link again.

Or that’s what I thought at least. Clearly I, and my brain, were massively under-caffeinated because I had misunderstood the era we live in. Something I would be reminded of few hours later only.



Definition of impersonate
impersonated; impersonating
transitive verb
: to assume or act the character of : personate
— Merriam-Webster definition of impersonate

Of course, I had to dig slightly deeper and requested more information, especially given the very arbitrary and unilateral decision of Twitter’s account violation crew around this issue. Since Twitter’s response merely updated me about the “crime” committed and gave no option to defend myself, let alone prove being the actual operator of the account.


Obviously, I was intrigued who the account was supposed to impersonate. Especially given that the URL was linked in the profile, and as such, I would be the only one capable of claiming an impersonation violation expect that it wouldn’t be impersonation. But more about that later.

I was surprised to now receive a reply within minutes only, compared to the several hours which went between my appeal and the initial answer from Twitter’s HQ.



Suddenly I was given the opportunity to appeal and prove that I have the legal opportunity to actually operate under the name on my official ID and wouldn’t thus be “impersonating”.

Except for the little detail that there wasn’t a case of impersonation because unless somebody goes through life being named steemobserver, which IMNSHO seems rather unlikely, there is no person involved here and as such no impersonation either. Nor would I thus be able to defend myself and get access to the account again because... @steemobserver is not my legal name.

No, it isn’t. It truly isn’t.


Obviously, it seemed that I had a triggered something now and the response was equally helpful.


Having earlier checked Twitter’s impersonation rules I was pretty sure I didn’t violate them thus responded once more, yet the case was literally closed and I received an automated canned reply in response to my response. ¯_(ツ)_/¯


Yet another message I didn’t get through.


While, obviously, when trying to promote an account - especially in the crypto niche - there are benefits from being on Twitter, the ludicrous nature of there appeal rejection begs questions.

The first question obviously being whether the responding staff actually had a look at things. Which seems rather doubtful. But maybe there is the possibility that they know somebody actually named steemobserver.

Impersonation is a violation of the Twitter Rules. Twitter accounts portraying another person in a confusing or deceptive manner may be permanently suspended under the Twitter impersonation policy.

An account will not be removed if:

  • The user shares your name but has no other commonalities, or
  • The profile clearly states it is not affiliated with or connected to any similarly-named individuals.

Accounts with similar usernames or that are similar in appearance (e.g. the same avatar image) are not automatically in violation of the impersonation policy. In order to be impersonation, the account must also portray another person in a misleading or deceptive manner.
Twitter’s Impersonation Policy

Who knows, right.

Yet, the ease with which an account can be suspended despite 7 years of good standing (no strike or warning was ever given to that account) obviously shows that Twitter has issues. Nothing which we didn’t know yet but the issues are real.

At the same time, anybody who has an account which doesn’t reference them in name, may be left out and incapable to reclaim access to their account if their Twitter username doesn’t match their ID.

Whether somebody filed a complained or whether an algo caught the account is rather irrelevant at this point, the response of the staff and their apparent inability to whether read or understand are much bigger a problem.

As most of us here on the blockchain know, Twitter isn’t the only culprit when it comes to such arbitrary suspensions. Suspensions apparently without possibility to actual recourse.


I still plan to continue tweeting, from my “personal” account - at least until that one is suspended - and I accept that Twitter and Jack apply whichever rules and processes they deem fit. I, myself, reserve the right to care less about the centralized platform, now fully aware that using a nickname in similar circumstances will not allow me any opportunity to successfully appeal and regain access to my account.

Welcome to the (Steem) Blockchain

With the added bonus of potentially being rewarded (in crypto) for them spent on accounts and interaction, Jack, Mark, and Sergey may not yet accept it but unless they change tact... dinosaurs eventually were extinct and blockchain will disrupt them as too.


Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  


I've had a similar battle with Facebook... I had once clicked on the post promotion service to get the word out about a big blog post, but had put in the incorrect credit card details. Instead of letting me fix it, this constituted a policy violation and can now never use that service again. I've raised a number of tickets, but they're always auto-closed without discussion and I just receive a vague message about a policy violation without informing me about a.) what the policy is b) how I could fix it.

Stupidly I probably would have spent a bit promoting my posts, so I should be happy they saved me and sent me off searching for an alternative.

This isn't just restricted to tech though... Ikea is amazing when it works, and the worst when it doesn't. It legitimately took me 8 weeks and maybe 15 phone calls (where you're on hold for like an hour and a half) to get them to return a mattress that was causing allergies.

I'm sorry this happened to you... super frustrating, there are maybe a trillion blog related Twitter accounts (I've had one for years) so I can only guess that you were targeted because blockchain is bad.


Blockchain is indeed bad and it will be badder even when ever more switch over to the de-centralized life. :)

Wow this is crazy. I don’t understand the triggering action in the a person behind this I wonder....

Posted using Partiko iOS


That’s pretty much all I can think of. But then I must wonder what was used as documentation to stake their claim and what parts of “impersonation” policy the account violated.

Anyway, I won’t appeal their decision. I even didn’t share this post on Twitter. #ImwithKaep

You're kidding. Someone had to have read your responses at least, judging how fast they turned and slapped you on the proverbial wrist with the suspension. But that's exactly my problem. Here's a rather simple case, which could use just the tiniest bit of human correspondence, which I personally don't think you received, save for the last message. I can almost hear the smug look on "anon-admin's" face when it reads:

This account will not be restored.


But instead, they suspend you without a word.

And people ask me why I don't like Twitter! There's never a reason to like them!


To be honest, I still am ROFLMFAO at the degree of incompetence but I’m not kidding. ;)

Highly rEsteemed!

Just add the twitter to the website as the official twitter of


It is linked. I would even have added a meta tag in the header if actually given a chance.

But alas, I’m not appealing. Waste of time and I doubt I will sleep better because of it.

Hi @fknmayhem!

Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 4.651 which ranks you at #1534 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has improved 5 places in the last three days (old rank 1539).

In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 450 contributions, your post is ranked at #27.

Evaluation of your UA score:
  • Some people are already following you, keep going!
  • The readers appreciate your great work!
  • Good user engagement!

Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server