You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steem - Tokyo
Well, thank you for not adding me. I will try to only make actions that the majority won't consider spam. I did promise my followers that I will send them the profits from my Gift! post. I feel that I am obliged to do this. Will sending out those memos be considered spam from your perspective?
Not really memo spam in that case.
The mass advertising with the .001 steem was venturing a little far into spam land.
Thanks, I really don't like adding 'real' people to @mack-bot.. They tend to complain and make appeals. 😆
What if the mass advertising memo was sent out to select accounts based on the different variables such as account age, SP, balances, activity, etc... Do you think that would be "less" spammy?
It would definitely be a lot less spam.
The problem you create at the moment is that with every transaction the size of the block chain grows. With it so does the cost to witnesses, such as my self, to maintain servers with enough memory to continue to operate. This is being addressed and will change in the future.
One person memo spamming, comment spamming, follow spamming or vote spamming isn't a problem. It's when others see such activity as acceptable and decide to do the same.
Thank you for the advice! I will take this into consideration in the future when building bots for the Steem blockchain.
@money-dreamer,
I wanted to share something with you I had come across from another user that I thinks would be helpful to put these issues into a larger context.
I will include a section but encourage you take the time to read the post in it's entirety.
https://steemit.com/steem/@troglodactyl/is-steem-a-ponzi-scheme
Together @money-dreamer, we can build this platform but it is, indeed, the manner of which we build that will determine whether the structure stands or falls.