RE: Banned on Youtube: El Paso Witness Says She Saw 3/4 Shooters - Not 1. This is A Repeated Theme in Multiple US Shootings.
You already understood what I said in regards to people watching the cams so that's done and over, but as for you trying to continue on with whatever this argument you were trying to make is still pointless, but after looking at the latest walmart security absolute fail I decided to come to take a last look at your latest reply and compare your opinions vs reality.
The shooter comes armed into a walmart with all these live cams you tried to cry about, and yet the price checker couldnt stop him? Because apparently they didn't seem to have security to try and stop the guy, so the manager when alerted had to pull the fire alarm. This must be one of the severely lacking walmarts like I was talking about which only enforces my point not yours.
Thanks to an off duty fireman the guy was stopped, so what happened to all this security and live cams that you speak of? They also have cams outside surrounding their buildings and should have seen this guy coming you would think! It's sad really to see such fail.
Again I offered honesty that's being backed up by reality, as for the bottled sodas if dollar tree can offer them for a dollar then walmart can lower the price as well, so if you want some 50 cent sodas you're gonna have to hit the vending machines because I actually shop there and am very familiar with their stores and even just the other day a manager was being yelled at and the manager was telling some guy to leave. Maybe he wouldn't have to yell back at rude people to leave if their security was better.
When they have to depend on the news to catch thieves and off duty firemen to stop acts of terror even though they have all these so-called live cams, and you tried to defend that and still keep trying to ramble on, smh... well they're looking worse than I originally thought. Your argument was dead long ago just gonna have to face it. Adios try and have a good life! 👍
"The suspect was taken into custody by Springfield police after he allegedly entered a local Walmart at around 4:10 p.m. while armed and dressed in what appeared to be tactical gear."
"He reportedly grabbed a shopping cart and began pushing it around while recording himself on a phone, Springfield’s KYTV reported. After being alerted to this, the store manager pulled a fire alarm and shoppers fled."
"Police say Andreychenko also attempted to exit the store but was met by an armed off-duty fireman. The unidentified man detained the suspect UNTIL OFFICERS ARRIVED on the scene and were able to take him into police custody."
https://www.foxnews.com/us/missouri-suspect-idd
"Andreychenko left the store after a few minutes and was held at gunpoint by an off-duty firefighter until officers arrived moments later, Lt. Mike Lucas, with the Springfield Police Department, said.
No shots were fired during the incident Thursday. Andreychenko was arrested after he was stopped by an armed off-duty firefighter, Springfield police said. No one was injured."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/08/09/springfield-missouri-walmart-armed-man-identified/1966660001/
You insinuating or outright try to argue that they use fake cameras to deter theft is retarded as fuck, especially when I pointed out that they have hundreds of cameras WITH their very own monitors in the aisles, so when you tried to say that more cameras would somehow translate to better theft prevention it was equally retarded as fuck and worthy of ridicule, as it is ridiculous to think that "more cameras" will mean anything without the manpower to monitor them. So you can call "whatever this argument pointless" but you cannot form a valid argument backed by reasoning and facts, all you can do is claim it's pointless nil reasoning and call it "whatever", indicating that you have shit for points to make.
I don't know if you understand what I said at all because I said absolutely nothing inn regards to the shoter, or the response of employees now did I? So I'll just chuck this whining that I said anything like that as more retarded confused as all fuck idiocy.
Obviously they are fake cameras amirite lol.
Flawlessly argument, sound conclusion /Slaps knee.
The point is what Walmart pays for them, what it costs Walmart, way over your head it seems. Also you just reasoned that it was their lack of security why people are told to leave or that better security means less rude people. Flawless logic yet again..
Yes because repeating nonsense and saying some other idiotic nonsense like they depend when depend on such is not what they do at all, means you're right and correct that they use fake cameras, or that more cameras somehow translate to less theft or maniacs or rude people. Makes sense. Look at all the stores that have the comparable traffic Walmart has and how they don't even have receipt checkers, that was another one of your idiotic nonsense.