You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DEMONETIZED: Will Gun Control Really Make a Difference?

in #threespeak5 years ago

Gun free zones dont work because you can easily cross borders.

Was irrelevant because America has too many guns right now anyway. Also borders Mexico... Its not a good argument. Also if you follow through on the steps that would take place to enforce banning of guns it would mean massive increase in gun violence.

Also lol at the downvote HAHA, I was wondering when you would finally give in and throw the first penny punch. lol Fucking resorted to censorship piece of immoral shit! How does it feel to know you gave up any potential of having moral high ground at this point. I never once fucking downvoted your shit no matter what. Because unlike you I believe everyone should have a right to their opinions.

But now we all can see where you stand. A censorship hungry piece of shit. :)

Whaaaaahhh I hate Trump but I want him to take our guns away!
WAHHH NAZIS ARE COMING QUICK TAKE AWAY EVERYONE'S GUNS!!

The logic of banning guns is AMAZING to me. You would think the first thing ANTIFA needs to do is get more guns...

This is fucking cringe... You want TRUMP, a known racist Nazi (In your mind) to take away our guns.

Sort:  

Lol im not censoring you im lowering the money you make off of uninformed gibberish. You having a meltdown only makes me want to actually censor you just to watch you cry tho. You have no room for nuance so your arguments make no sense since its just straw man after straw man after straw man.

Cry harder.

Posted using Partiko Android

Lol im not censoring you im lowering the money you make off of uninformed gibberish

It means you got salty as fuck and had to resort to downvotes :D
That's called jealousy. You got mad nobody cares about your opinions and decided to hit me up for a penny.

also

Gun free zones dont work because you can easily cross borders.

Was irrelevant because America has too many guns right now anyway. Also borders Mexico... Its not a good argument. Also if you follow through on the steps that would take place to enforce banning of guns it would mean massive increase in gun violence.

^ You are just mad you got nothing to counter this.

  1. Buyback
  2. Federal borders are more secure than state borders, factually.
  3. Assault weapons can kill 50 people in 20 seconds.
  4. Youve most definitely never experienced a shooting situation and it shows.

Posted using Partiko Android

  1. I really don't think that would do it. Criminals and crazies, the ones you need to remove the guns from, are not going to do it. Law abiding and sane people might. Criminals and crazies are both criminal and crazy. If all we had in America was law abiding and sane people then your plan would potentially work.

  2. The Mexico boarder is a joke. Its the entire reason for the whole build a wall thing with Trump. Its especially not going to be more secure if Trump loses in 2020. Well maybe, democrats kind of have a history of being far more brutal than they make themselves out to be. Obama was a huge war hawk and was brutal to immigrants.

  3. Does not matter if they kill a zillion infants every second. Criminals and crazies will never give up their guns. You have to do it by force.

  4. At least I am not the kind of person who conflates right wing politics as being pro gun violence. It actually blows my mind that there are people who have become so partisan that they just think the other side is basically evil.

I want a solution, I want less gun violence. But there isn't a solution right now. One way to reduce gun violence would be to reduce the rise of communism in the country. The destruction of a generation tends to lead to the decline and blowoff phase of a civilization. You end up getting harder times.

AAACivilizationBubblePhase.jpg

I think we are just fucked.

Was irrelevant because America has too many guns right now anyway.

Thats what makes them cheap.

  1. Availability
  2. Ease of moving them across US
  3. Quantity
  4. Ease of acquiring.

I would think thats the whole point of the ban and regulation. To CHANGE the fact that the US has too many guns.

I mean people for regulation and bans say that by making those adjustments there would be less guns and less gun violence, mass shootings, what ever and your answer is basically:

You cant have less guns because the US has a lot of guns.

Lol. And you have the gal to pound your chest and call yourself a "victor" in the convo with the girl there.
Give me a break.

Posted using Partiko Android

I would think thats the whole point of the ban and regulation. To CHANGE the fact that the US has too many guns.

You would need to do it by force. It would be a civil war easily. That's the problem. Listen to me, its never going to happen and the difference it would make if everyone did give them up would be a net negative anyway. Gun crime would be largely the same, mass shootings would be the same. Home invasions would sky rocket. other kinds of crime would increase dramatically. Its suggesting we go into civil war for no reason.

Your argument is completely illogical

No its not, its 100% solvent. Its something that can never happen anyway, and even if it did nothing would change. Performing the act would also require basically going into civil war.

And in the case of a liberal who hates Trump and believes Nazis are on the rise it makes even less sense.

Imagine being so stupid as to claim we need a group like ANTIFA to protect us from the Nazi horde and then demand we take away everyone's guns.

The first thing the Nazis did was take away everyone's guns lol

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.16
JST 0.030
BTC 67350.62
ETH 2656.28
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.69