Sort:  

Humans are not even good enough to consider/consume for FOOD, I mean even if we consider this option of cannibalism then also it would be bad idea, because I think, with "n" number of diseases and varieties of cancers, STDs and God know how many more diseases yet to reveal their faces. You know, if human is consumed by wild animals then there is a fear of them having diabetes and mental disorder, now that being an animal, imagine this situation for Human consuming humans, some. This idea of fighting climate change with cannibalism will be least feasible and would be non-effective, this will actually trigger a mental disorder across Globe.

While some ideas seem to be noble they must be checked for ethical correctness. Clearly, the said scientist lacks the moral inclination to ascertain such claim.

PS: Knowledge without morals is vain.
Quote unknown

Congratulations @revsimonsideways! You have completed the following achievement on the Steem blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You got your First payout
You received more than 100 as payout for your posts. Your next target is to reach a total payout of 250

You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:

SteemitBoard supports the SteemFest⁴ Travel Reimbursement Fund.
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!

Bon Appetit
soylentgreen.jpg

An old Idea really.

I want to invite you to my new Steem Community: Carbonists. Carbonists.

We Carbonists believe we should try get the carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere to at least 1200 ppm for the benefit of plants.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.21
TRX 0.25
JST 0.039
BTC 98204.12
ETH 3444.02
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.22