You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: September 11, 2001
I get extra-skeptical when I see proclamations like those on her site.
Man has in his hands a method of disrupting the molecular basis for matter and the ability to split the earth in half on a moments notice . . . This evidence is central to it all. 9/11 was a demonstration of a new technology; free energy.
That's not a scientific statement, that's fearmongering and speculation. That's why I'd be interested in independent analysis of all samples of 9/11 dust saved by people in a double-blind study with no preconceptions tainting data interpretation.
Hey @jacobtothe, thanks for your reply!
You have simply read the logical conclusion that any person with common sense can arrive by analyzing the evidence exposed in 550 pages rich in strictly scientific EVIDENCE... science is based on observation without prejudices, right?
I assure you that your hasty conclusion is incorrect.
What about the 12 minutes video?
What surprised you?