You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: September 11, 2001
In the only forensic expertise still carried out following the destruction of the WTC, for sure is included a dust samples analysis, as written on dr. Judy Wood bio here.
If you can't find it on-line, let me know and I'll send you a photo of her book's page where she talks about it.
A huge hug!
I get extra-skeptical when I see proclamations like those on her site.
That's not a scientific statement, that's fearmongering and speculation. That's why I'd be interested in independent analysis of all samples of 9/11 dust saved by people in a double-blind study with no preconceptions tainting data interpretation.
Hey @jacobtothe, thanks for your reply!
You have simply read the logical conclusion that any person with common sense can arrive by analyzing the evidence exposed in 550 pages rich in strictly scientific EVIDENCE... science is based on observation without prejudices, right?
I assure you that your hasty conclusion is incorrect.
What about the 12 minutes video?
What surprised you?