Can IPFS Bring An End to the Facebook Era?

in technology •  3 months ago

Many against freedom of speech ran to twitter to celebrate Alex Jones being terminated from major social media platforms earlier this week. But I am not celebrating, as I see it as a loss for our personal freedoms. Dirty games being played by the centralized big tech companies often entail large amounts of money being pumped into the political system. Making for a vicious cycle that can spiral Internet censorship out of control if not checked.

Source: NASA

Companies and governments utilizing different propaganda tactics can often shape the public consciousness into believing things that are not based within reality. If a whole group of people have their claims dismissed as "conspiracy theorists" while at the same time not allowing anyone else to have the ability to debunk them, who is to say what is a conspiracy and what isn't? In the current age of social media, it is common for YouTube, Twitter, and Facebook to censor even run of the mill everyday people.

You can test this for yourself by posting something hateful or even by misspelling one word. Facebook disabled many accounts for that simple action. Another concern I have with that practice is humans are not even being involved with the overseeing of the review process. Many cases of censorship happen for no other reason than Facebook's bot misunderstanding a word. This makes for a dangerous combination of censorship and a fear of speaking up in lieu of being banned.

One of the best example that I can think of is Facebook banning mechanics for using the word trans to describe transmissions. Trans can trigger as an unacceptable word to Facebook's machine learning programs. Using this word in reference to a transmission caused many accounts to be suspended and some even deleted. Making it clear to users that it really does not matter what the original content or meaning was.

Revolutionary technologies like IPFS aim to solve many problems we are facing now with online censorship. IPFS stands for Interplanetary File System. IPFS is Utilizing a special database called the IPFS Dag. In laments terms, IPFS is similar to a secure distributed database. Because of the nature of peer to peer technology, IPFS can be more efficient than the usual way big tech does things. As it combines file sharing with using a secure database similar to a Blockchain's.

IPFS when fully implemented into the end-user applications will provide many features that will prove to be an unlikely feat for the traditional big tech companies to solve. One of those being the ability to host files for one's own neighbor down the street. In theory users could even make money for hosting files in this way. The limits for decentralized networks like IPFS and Steem are truly endless. Internet Pioneer Vint Cerf stated back in 2007 at a Google conference that he thought peer-to-peer technology would be future of Internet communications.

Technologies like IPFS have the potential to grow quickly as both speed and reliability can improve as time goes on. Hopefully making Facebook less relevant in the future and the business less profitable. In my opinion, IPFS based solutions are one of the prime candidates to pull people away from Zuckerburg's centralized ring of control.

Authors get paid when people like you upvote their post.
If you enjoyed what you read here, create your account today and start earning FREE STEEM!
Sort Order:  

I'm going to play devils advocate regarding the Alex Jones censorship. I heard this viewpoint on a podcast. At the end of the day the platforms that have censored him are running a business. The users on those platforms especially the high profile ones play a big role in the perception of the business. So can we really fault these businesses for removing content that is perceived as bad for the business when these businesses were never marketing themselves as the "free speech" platform?


The president uses these platforms to communicate and they all have taken government money. So yes, it's a violation off free speech and the argument about private companies is null and void. Private companies also ran script scams on coalminers for many years until they woke up and fought with force and violence against the owners.

Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by Graylan | gray00 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, someguy123, neoxian, followbtcnews, and netuoso. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows. Please find us at the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.

If you would like to delegate to the Minnow Support Project you can do so by clicking on the following links: 50SP, 100SP, 250SP, 500SP, 1000SP, 5000SP.
Be sure to leave at least 50SP undelegated on your account.

Good news my friend... This is the end of facebook, Steemit is the future now. A hug from Venezuela.


Absolutely. I agree. Steemit is the future .

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

I'm with you there buddy, I think we really did'nt have the true or real freedom to talk what we want and ofcourse I think that there are real huge or powerful people controlling the news behind the scenes as well so we really can't say what is true or conspiracy right?


It gets harder day after day to uncover the truth.

great piece! you are really taking off as a blogger, very happy for you!


Thank you torico. That means the world coming from you.

This is a meaningful topic choice Graylan! This is what we all need to be concerned with.. and discussing! This is why Steemit is the way forward. Even though my channel here does not cover political topics. The way I found D.Tube was through censorship that was happening after the incident in LasVegas at the Harvest festival. My friends and I were punished for "thinking" and "asking" questions. Apparently having thoughts is a crime. As is to merely ask a question. It seems our freedom is just an illusion. @gray00