Re-Posting Good Content into a chainBB Sub-Forum With Reward Distribution to Authors [Discussion]
Here is my dilemma: good mathematical content can be found across many, many tags within Steemit but when those articles appear on chainBB they are placed within a sub-forum defined by the first tag used by the author.
This means that some very good content will never appear within the Mathematics sub-forum. Yes, I can resteem such posts but that only distributes them to my followers; it is a one-time promotion and it cannot change the tags. Every other form of promotion suffers from the same long term problem: that an article will eventually fade away outside of its appropriate community.
However, if an article could be placed within its appropriate sub-forum it has a chance of being picked up later and restarting the conversation. Now we seem to have the technology to do this in such a way as to benefit both the community and the original author.
What I propose is to create a new post that links to the original and includes tags so that it is within the required chainBB sub-forum. This will not be a re-post but will have the same title, the author and a link to the original. Using the new Reward Distribution app found in chainBB, the original author can be awarded, say, 80% of the net earnings, the rest going towards curation.
Essentially, this creates something like an index card which sits in the appropriate sub-forum. I am trying to think of a good name for this... something like index, pointer or reference, so that the article will appear as, "The Mathematics of Blockchains [ref]."
I don't see any down-sides to this; indeed, the original author will gain extra revenue. This is also a way to reward older articles where the original author does not wish to repost them as that would require a bit of editing. The author will obviously be asked for their permission first.
What does everyone think?
Please consider resteeming so as to expand discussion.
Thanks for reading.
Really a great idea!
Hi math-trail,
Your idea of an "index card" reference is perfect!
Thanks for your genius!
How can I resist when called a genius! ;-)
If everyone could please resteem this at some point so that we get some general consensus. Thanks
Any negative views? Any counter-arguments? Any huge gaping pitfalls?
Maybe we can call it "indexing" - to go with "curating".
I love it. I am just beginning to get the hang of Steemit and was mulling over the same issue. Thanks heaps.
Hello does everyone want to know the grow of steemit here is the amazing figures from May
https://steemit.com/steemit/@newmarket65/steemit-2-million-more-website-hits-in-may
follow me and i will follow you
hey @math-trail I appreciate your idea.
i thought i would share this update on Steemit website views
https://steemit.com/steemit/@newmarket65/steemit-2-million-more-website-hits-in-may
follow me and i will follow you