You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The neutron darkness in a bottle (and a beam)
The fact of not having any degree is a good reason for not shutting up and speaking! In fact, no one should never restrain himself/herself from asking a question.
At least, I am always available (and if not, I find a suitable moment later). And I actually a bunch of people who are too. But this is country and mentality dependent of course.
i couldn't agree more :) shutting up has never been my forté anyway hahah
This is a nice quality, IMO ^^
i might have a few obscure qualities hidden somewhere, its hard to tell in the middle of nay sayers who feel one should stick to one topic. I personally think it's not the truth , because tends to be a relative concept, but its the power of the question and the will to use it that matters more. anyway, its a long way to go still, but your work is really top-notch man
I agree with that: one topic always brings something more, and so on :D
Thanks for the nice comment on my work, btw ^^
well, you deserve more than i can hand out lol its hearfelt and honest, its like doing gods work in the 2018s (metaforically ofcourse, i dont believe in gods who care, i have my own theory on how anything of divine magnitude, if exist would have a hard time noticing microbial scum like the like of us without using a divine electron microscope lol so if that god of theirs exists its probably not even aware unless its actively looking :p)
but i also leave everyone to their beliefs as long as they dont shove theirs up my aa, down my throat heh
for all i know the ancient ones designed it so when the universe breathes in again the supermassive black holes will collect all data like a cosmic zipfile, makes it easy for aliens of divine magnitude to come back in a few hundred billion and collect the data from their 'little experiment'
yea m.... noting crazier than von danichen would cook up ;-)
I personally believe in facts. The rest does not really matter ;)
shakespeare would disagree between heaven and earth and einstein never let the lack of fact stop him from being right before he could prove it lol but its a super-scientist thing to say i suppose :)
it's like atheists would go : god has not been proven therefor there is none
thats why i prefer the polytheist agnostic approach : "i dont know" ;-)
I am not forbidding myself to investigate speculative theories. I am just saying that data is there and data must be accommodated. By saying "I believe in facts", i was meaning I believe in what data tells me. Data does not forbid anything new. However, anything new must accounted for all data accumulated so far. Otherwise, this is cheating.