RE: NASA establishes that X-rays of between 65-200 keV trigger nuclear FUSION reactions - Patent published
The connection between space and energy can easily be identified and explained by a novel device which I was the engineer for.
See paragraph titled "The Right Stuff" on the following page:
http://imaging3.com/Dominion/Technology
The equation to understand how energy transforms into space and vice versa is simple high school/early college math. The high school text books are not incorrect. They only cover half the subject matter that they should and need to cover. Math is a tool that serves humans. If there is something that cannot be seen or identified by man then do not expect a mathematics equation in high school geometry class that will cover that topic. High school geometry deals with space and only space. Space can be transformed into energy. The high school text books need to be rewritten to include both. Otherwise they are deficit in my opinion.
Hi jacktca,
What you link to is a solar tower project, or did you mean something else?
What the above article is referring to is that NASA has shown that specifically accelerated electrons, yielding specific energy photons lead to Nuclear fusion.
It is then saying that in multiple citizen science projects, (Hutchison, Ralkar, me356) glowing without extra heat has been observed and in all three cases, nuclear transmutation has been established.
Wonderful. But do you understand why? I have worked with xrays a little and may be able to help you understand your phenomenon. Consider this experiment. Fill up a car with only 3 gallons of gasoline in Los Angeles. Spin the bottle and drive in that direction. Where will you end up? Tijuana? Mojave desert? Certainly not San Francisco. Not enough gas to visit Bill Gates in Seattle as well. That is a simple example of how one can interchange energy with space. Xray generators like the linear acceleron provide energy with direction. Notice the last step in the video where direction is altered by a prism or what-not to provide uniform direction. When one transforms energy and space one realizes both how fragile and how extremely stable our 3D reality is. I believe extreme stability is where you might find the answer to your LENR questions. The NASA article mentions power generation. Power may not be generated at all. The system may be getting rid of excess power to maintain stability. You mention specific NASA settings. Monkey with the KV of the DVIS (imaging3 toy) or the period of the orbit and I guarantee your 3D image will disintegrate right before your eyes on your fancy monitors. A little more of this or less of that and all bets are off. Using an anomaly, consider a country that prints money. Along comes inflation. Inflation is so bad this causes social unrest. People are upset. What does the government do? Cuts 4 zeros off the currency at new year and starts over. You had 10000 pesos now you have 1 peso. Power is not generated just like money is not created after chopping zeros off of currency and reprinting. Stability and equilibrium however is maintained.
oops!
Are you deliberately trying to be cryptic?
If you want to look at fragility of 3space, look at Hutchison's work or the AAG interview with Stanislav Adamenko from 2006 when he reveals they found 100um object in their ash that acted like black holes.
No, not trying to be cryptic. It is difficult to describe the connection between a static one directional energy system, like the linear accelerator, and a gantry which rotates at a fast rate, like once per second. I think that the same forces that affect the DVIS 3D image process may be involved with LENR. Take for instance the question of how does Brilliant Light Power create all that light? The MIT guy behind that operation claims that he speeds up or slows down the orbit of a hydrogen electron. As I said above monkeying with the period of the orbit affects the stability of the 3D object. That's like the government printing money. The system can fall apart or to maintain equilibrium the system can respond with deflation. Cut several zeros off of your currency and all is well. That could be the source of your excess energy. By the way I am not a physicist. I have 1-2 years of math/physics for computer scientists behind me not the full monty. So I may act cryptic to avoid looking dumb when I think I see a connection which could be way off.
By the way, regarding Adamenko's hole. Press the button labeled "Agriculture" on this website below then search for the term "NASA".
http://imaging3.com/Dominion/Applications
Nice view of a hole in an apple. What's wrong with this picture? A hole is not a "look at the fragility of 3D space" silly! Look/see only applies to things. One cannot see nothing.
He he, I had a "oh you dummy" moment when I was trying to adjust settings to see holes inside an apple. I realized that there is nothing to adjust because there is nothing to see because a hole does not exist. A hole by definition is the lack of anything. And yet there it is in the image. Looks like a JPL/NASA crater photo. Only I did not spend billions of dollars of taxpayers money to do a spacecraft flyby.