How to Detect Chemtrails - Like a Pro (total cost < 20 $)
What? I'm deadly serious... If there are chemtrails someone should prove them.
And I will show you how!
There are two options, for 0.00 $ and for about 30 $, thus everyone could do it.
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmbQHzGZfNbqFAAtkssDzHYAFuuSbgrwNJ7Q3ZEZM1EtiC/image.png)
What do you need?
- something dark, like a box, or a tube, or whatever
- something to split the light (CD, DVD, diffraction grating)
- some camera (webcam is just fine)
- some free software, but it's not obligatory
How to, Step 1: make a dark box
Amateur version:
In this phase, you want to get the light from some source (sample) you want to examine.
The beam of light should be "as straight as possible" and narrow, thus the opening should be a slit (several mm, let's say, 3 mm). Then the tube should be several dm, thus for 3 mm slit, we will make 30 cm long box.
As you can see, the camera will be at some angle, about 30 - 40 degrees.
Semi-pro version:
This scheme is almost the same, but you can take a lens to disperse the light a bit.
The ultimate Pro Version:
Just grab some telescope, with the T-mount.
Step 2: Decompose the light
Amateur version:
Make a rainbow! Why? Because the materials have different absorption spectra. Visible region is not the most interesting spectral region - but it still works. You will be able to see if something is just the water vapour, blue sky of some unknown chemical.
The simplest and the cheapest way to get some "rainbow making material" would be to peel-off the CD.
Just cut the CD with the scissors and peel it off using the duct-tape.
When the light passes through this material, different wavelengths will take the "different turn" (different angle) and you will get the recognizable rainbow pattern.
DVDs are more tricky because you will need to spit the two plastic parts, but they provide almost double the effect.
Just a two more remarks: take the outer part of the disc, because it's the least curved. And take the blank disc, because after the data are imprinted to the disc, the effect becomes worse.
Semi-pro version:
Go to Amazon and buy one of these:
Take the linear diffraction grating with 1000 lines/mm, the results will be much better than with the 500 lines/mm diffraction grating (12 - 27 degrees, λ = 400 - 900 nm for 500 lin./mm vs 24 - 64 degrees, λ = 400 - 900 nm for 1000 lin./mm)
Don't buy the double-axis!
The Ultimate Pro version:
You have the telescope... You know where this is going :)
You want to see the emission spectra of the stars, and to identify chemical elements inside them.
You will need one of these:
This is Star Analyser SA-100 or SA-200.
Step 3: Camera to register the light
Amateur version:
It's far most simple to use the webcam, because it has a small sensor and everything will be in focus. Just stuck the piece of CD/DVD on your camera - and that's it!
You will need only to adjust the angle.
Semi-Pro Version:
You will need the camera and focus to the diffraction grating.
And, in order to calibrate the spectrometer, you could take some LED diodes:
Blue: 465 nm, Green: 520 nm, Red: 620 nm.
Just lightup the spectrometer with each LED and make the calibration - simple...
The Ultimate Pro Version:
Ok, you got the filter. It has 58 mm diameter and 1.25" thread (Canon friendly).
If you have some lens with the strange diameter, you will need adapters, to reduce the diameter (it costs several $).
Software:
Amateur version:
You don't need anything. Just open the photos in any software and see if the profile from the left to right is the same for the clouds and chemtrails.
Semi-Pro Version:
Visit this website: http://www.theremino.com/fr/downloads/automation and search for "Spectromètre Theremino
". It's a great little software that allows you to have a real-time insight to your signals.
The Ultimate Pro Version:
At the same website where you got the filter - get the software:
https://www.rspec-astro.com/setupdownload/
What's the point of this post, I haven't read it.
It was too long!
Well, if you can make a spectrometer in your home, in 1 day and with the very modest budget (even 0.00 $), just imagine what could be done with the "real" spectrometers.
Type in Google "UV-VIS spectra of your substance". But we can go beyond, to more informative IR region. You could do it DIY as well, but you would need to remove IR filter of your camera's sensor (this is not easy).
If there is something strange going on with the chemtrails - we would know the very same day, by measuring the spectra from the distance.
Enjoy the weekend and read steemSTEM
![](https://steemitimages.com/DQmY1vq5q5qCvMsvcJvi6CX5XdT9docKq3C4hGRd99Adpab/image.png)
Oh, spectrometry... Detecting things from planets to "chemtrails."
I've never even considered someone supplying proof through spectrometry, but I'm going to refer to that for now on after this post. I'm sick of people spewing shit that they know nothing about (I do this all the time but shhhh) without backing it up.
Thanks :) Once I got into the debate about the chemtrails and the argument was: "yeah, of course you can't detect poisonous chemicals, because those never fall down!"
I've got a nikon p900 and am going to take a look at that start analyser. I have a 67mm for the filter attachments. I am going to have to complete another couple jobs as I am also wanting to get a wide angle lens for some better timelapse videos of these aerosol trails that are always in the skies in Nashville, TN.
Good read, check out some of my posts if you're inclined. Feedback is always welcomed
p900 is mean :D At the wide side, it's 24 mm equivalent. In that superzoom class, only Panasonic FZ-80 (or however they call it on your market) is wider (20 mm).
If you want to go wider - you will need dSLR (Canon + 10-18 lens) or some Sony + Samyang 12
Could anyone actually pursue this and prove chemtrails true or false? Alex has provided the method..now get out there!
There are 3 important things that could be proven in a day with marginal resources (thus those 3 things could not be hidden. No way):