Dear @guruvaj

Thank you for your comment.

But the 20% beneficiary allocation from the payout could be very high to some low payout post, i guess find an average from the other suggestions.

I believe that 20% can be actually considered high for those who already have high payouts from post.

For those with low payouts, this solution is quite attractive.

Let's just have a look at example: average post of focusnow has close to zero payout on daily basis. If he would set up 20% beneficiary and receiving upvote from crypto.piotr and project.hope is already adding 9 SP to reward pool. So at the end 4.5 SP would belong to author and those 20% = less than 1 steem.

At the end of the day each of those authors will benefit. They will receive way more (upvotes, traffic) than they will give back. Also once I resteem post and promote with few large steem stakeholders who support our project then such a publication will probably double the payout.

tracking community post will be slightly difficult if a member (like me) are using different dapps from time to time in posting and managing resteems and upvotes.

Very true. Not much I can do about it. We will share posts on telegram and discord. Plus I'm resteeming them on @project.hope account. It surely does help a bit.

ps. I would highly recommend to visit @project.hope every now and then and drop and upvote at latest resteems. I'm upvoting them using current 180k SP within a day or two after resteem. So you can easily upvote them earlier on (before that large upvote) and that would kind of double strength of your upvote (thanks to non-linear reward curve). Does it make any sense? :)

If this remain a loosely knit group, then, it be hard to, produce predictable results, but will surely strive.

Thx for your feeback. Something to think about.

Yours, Piotr