Why write for so long while completely disregarding everything I wrote in the other thread?
I considered that the size of your viewership did not balance out with the reward that were allocated. Notice that I also didn't fully flag your post and flagged only a few of them.
Even after my flags you have $620.71 pending author rewards.
That's 620$ more than nothing.
If it's all it took for you to leave then good riddance!
It would appear there are more people that like my serialisations than agree with your self-imposed and I'll-conceived policing methods.
How about unflagging my posts?
They are original, well-written, good quality posts that give value and add to the platform's appeal. I'm not sure why you have taken such offence at 11 of my posts but popular consensus seems to disagree with you.
The people who vote on my posts like my writing and the way I put my stories on here, why not admit you may not have thought this out quite as much as you could have and remove the flags?
I'd think more of you for doing that and I'm sure I wouldn't be the only one.
Popular consensus isn't how this place is governed.
Steem is a very efficient transfer of value system, If these people want to support your work they can always send you Steem directly.
The daily reward pool is there for writers and curators and it's distribution is based on the voting patterns of each community within steemit such as those who vote for writers, photographers etc. Unless you are an elected witness here at steemit you have no authority to be 'policing' the reward pool.
Then what, you will punish them for sending her Steem? They already supported her by upvoting her posts. Popular consensus, although not embedded in Steem's design, remains an important factor in how the platform is functioning. That's what a blog is, right? To ignore it based on the blockchain's technicalities will not reduce the backlash you're getting.
What's the rational in this?
What backlash are you talking about?
All the commotion this flagging has created? Backlash?