You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Steemit Suggestions and Rationale. I hope that this will make people think their own thoughts.
Hello @ebryans,
Congratulations! Your post has been chosen by the communities of SteemTrail as one of our top picks today.
Also, as a selection for being a top pick today, you have been awarded a TRAIL token for your participation on our innovative platform...STEEM.
Please visit SteemTrail to get instructions on how to claim your TRAIL token today.
If you wish to not receive comments from SteemTrail, please reply with "Stop" to opt out.
Happy TRAIL!
I wish your folks really read the article.
We had 3 curators read it. Each found the suggestions in the article interesting and reached consensus to give an upvote.
Best if the other 200 people who upvoted will read it as well.
i agree. and some do.
Would really like for you to visit us in SteemTrail so you can take a look at how we conduct business. We can go over our process which starts with post selection, and can walk you through how a post receives an upvote.
Why should people vote without reading? Curation rewards? Bots?
Sadly, they vote without reading because the system virtually forces them to do so. The system revolves around Game Theory rather than Social Media, something which needs to be impressed upon IT people.
I really wish that you, @abit, would answer the questions, or are you looking at the abyss? You might be a person of power, behaving like a bull in a china shop makes you like a bully. Rather than reply with 'no, it cannot be done', explain why. It is a simple case of changing the logarithms to me. The distributions are done like this already. So ... why can't it be done and how could it be done or are you destined for Darwinian folklore?
@timcliff said all I wanted to say.
As a leader in this organisation, your responsibilities are bigger than you are giving them credit for. If that is your response, then you are both wrong! I wrote a message to you in steemit.chat - why do we not work together? It seems that we have to be at war - I don't want war - I want a future for the whole platform - Q1. There is no advantage in multiple accounts under my proposal - explain why you think there is - voting? If you are found to have multiple accounts without just cause and permission, you forfeit-simple. Whilst on the subject, why do you let noganoo have 200 accounts whilst mere mortals are impeded from having 2? Q2. It is a simple transaction. Adding to liquidity puts downwards pressure on the steem price. My proposal makes steem less liquid. Q3. Outsourcing of witnesses is an obvious step in the right direction. How can you defend a function being run by stakeholders? There is a clear conflict of interest. If you are so adamant to defend the status quo, why? Let's make it cheaper and more transparent. Q4. This is social media. It has been a bit of fun in the sun for the Game Theorists - time for them to stand aside and stop making money off other people's content. The heart and soul of steemit is the content creators. Whales are profiteering off that to a multiple which, if they knew would send an army of minnows to EAT every whale. Q5. It is Social Media. You have not addressed any one of these points properly - not ONE. WHY?
PS, I not that you did not address the rewards pool distribution - why?