Sort:  

200.000 dollars for an account is already whale league, and some of use have it here on Steemit, giving other almost no power. but yes, if the limit would be 200.000$ per account and I want to put 200.000.000$ into Steem, I would indeed create 1.000 accounts for that.

My opinion is that a human person is allowed 1 account, or multiple accounts but known to everyone that that person has multiple accounts and which accounts that are so that rules applied to the human person can be controlled at the combined account level (maybe that could be kind of anonymous but I'm too less a technical person to know what is possible by technology and what is still not possible). In such world when a power limit to 200.000$ would exists, I would decide to invest my 199.800.000$ in some other blockchain, company, enterprise, or whatever, when it is allowed by the 'government' rules. And even when I personally would not do that, other people will do it, that is what we have to learn from mankind, we always have people who sit at the boundaries of what is allowed and always will sit at those boundaries.

And if yes GOOD for steemit and steem prize - right ?

Correct, good for Steem price, but not good for who has control, since someone coming in with 200.000.000$ spread over 1.000 accounts will have 99,99%+ of voting power in the whole group, ie can act as a dictator!

Good points here will think about .

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 54554.44
ETH 2294.74
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.31