Yeah, no offense. You tagged me. I don't know either of you. You told your side of the story here but I don't know or trust either of you. So you could making this up and taking the screenshots above. Understand, 3rd parties don't know what's going on. And people just don't trust whoever says whatever. I can go on my blog as say you both stole it from me. Great story. No proof of anything. And I'm sure some people would believe me. Further, you've not provided any evidence of conversations, chats, dialogs, agreements, emails, or proofs that your side of the story has any validity. So I'm just apt to stay out of your argument. I only chimed in with food for though to help you and others understand that there is a moral subjective issue and a legal issue. You were calling for bias, for people to take sides per se, but the unemotional literal fact is you just told a story of what you want us to believe happenned. But you neither of you have provided evidence. You're basically saying you made that. Which we can establish considering you were credited once. Beyond that the actual terms of your agreement could be anything. And he may have every actual right to do what he did— fortunately or unfortunately.