You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Thoughts about capping rewards in an incentivized way

in #steemit8 years ago

The purpose is not to upset the whale-centric system (it has serious benefits in terms of eliminating sybil votes), but more to increase retention at the lower levels.

That's certainly a nice goal, but it it aims to retain the minnow who wants to click instead of write. I certainly understand: I tried to snap up some curation rewards when I started out here! But I also got the idea that I should be writing instead of just clicking away.

Are you trying to address a perceived unfairness induced by the impression (not "fact," impression) that the whales are making huge bank simply by clicking?

Sort:  

It's more like:

  • trying to spread author rewards between known authors and less known authors
  • incentivizing curation to not go the easy way of clicking "same old" (if the articles are capped or with diminishing rewards due to low multiplier) but discovering and curating good content from less known authors

Okay, thanks for clarifying.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.16
TRX 0.15
JST 0.028
BTC 60249.86
ETH 2347.79
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.52