The classic question in political theory is, who guards the custodians? I suppose that we ourselves, if we see an account that begins to make an apology for ISIS, we will put a flag on it, we will denounce it, will ban, we will put it invisible. We do it for less serious crimes, such as offending others, or for very serious things like child pornography. We would be justified in doing so to prevent terrorist attacks, and it would even be very serious if we do not denounce them. In cases like that, we are the custodians (witnesses). But we must also be custodians of the freedom of expression, and of the economic freedom to employ or mining Steemit, Steem Dollar, Bitcoin or any other cryptocurrency.
So, we must defend ourselves from the custodians (the government), for a very simple reason, we do not trust them. Not them neither the bankers who issue the fiat money that is pure debt and Over Taxation, because they control the financial system. And since they cannot control the issue and circulation of the cryptocurrencies yet, they are desperate, because it is a lot of money, and they want it for them ...
The threats of taxes by England, the resource of the fight against terrorism, are only facades of what is happening in the background, they are afraid of losing control.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild said: Allow me to issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws!
We are a threat to that, they are losing control, but the cryptocurrencies are here to stay, just like the block chain, just like the Internet.
It must be an unavoidable reality, since like the Chinese have just made a gigantic investment buying Steem Dollar, which has made our accounts here in Steemit go up a few cents.
And hi! Mr. Witness on charge of custody this account and this chat, ha ha ha, what a bloody job you got…