I have no preexisting agenda in favor of any Larimer or their views but the approach you are using tends to encourage me to dismiss your opinions as trolling and instead, at least on the margin, to support them, probably the opposite of what you intend.

@smooth, this comment makes us wonder if you DO have a preexisting agenda in favor of Larimer. You get all defensive for Dan all the damn time. I don't think he was being pejorative. Just clever.

So what gives? Are you and @dan related? Or do you just believe really strongly in the cause? Or both?

If you're related, heck, I wish my big brother defended me like that. If you believe in the cause, wouldn't you agree a little more transparency could go a long way and that investors would feel a little more confident if they could see the numbers of those who invest and earn, where the money goes, how it's bettering the economy here, what some plans are for decentralization, what technical developments are underway, etc.

Wouldn't you also agree that a little more transparency might discourage certain whales from gaming the system, making it more fair for other well-meaning whales, and minnows alike?