You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Liquid Steem Rewards are Here - Math Time!
changing the bias, which is what I believe you two are discussing with the wrong terminology, is simply letting the blockchain know how much rewards should be liquid. increasing the bias would lead to more liquid rewards.
no one is manipulating the feed price. feed price is pulled by a script from a variety of exchanges and averaged out over the past 3.5 days.. the witness feed price is only wrong when their script is acting up. It is never manipulated to produce some effect on sbd print rates. Bias is what we should be discussing here.
BTW, in case it makes you feel better, the system is so convoluted I almost think it is on purpose.
What tripped you up is exactly some of the stuff I mentioned on Discord clarifying up for others before. The Witness Price Feed, that is. A lot is actually dependent on it, and even I got it wrong, such as the relationship between Steem going up/down and our rewards... it's all VESTS man.
I think we are on the same page. The terminology is confusing due to how it is displayed in various places. At the end of the day, the blockchain only cares about one number: the number the witness states in its own feed price. (Look at the steemd page of the individual witness setting the price to see what I'm talking about)
see, that's where we are not on the same page...
all the way on the right hand side is the bias column... depending on where the bias is set is what determines how much rewards are liquid, and how much are sp. The higher the bias, the more liquid, and less SP... if no bias then it's 50/50 (also ignoring the actual price of sbd, but acting as though all sbd ==$1 worth of steem)
the bias has never been used by enough top witnesses (at least in my time here) for it to impact our rewards at all, but that is the variable which can be changed not the feed price. The feed price is Always to be a reflection of whatever is pulled and averaged from various exchanges and performed by a script.
I hear you, but again. It has the same effect as what I'm saying. For example: netuoso has a bias, and I found where it shows in steemd:
In the end it's the median of these prices that are set that determine the feed price the blockchain uses. Yes it uses the USD STEEM ticker as the base, but my point still stands.
(We could easily swap the feed for something else and get everyone to pin it to something else like gold which is what golos does, but I digress.)
ok, now I see where I was confused... what the bias does, is actually change the pricefeed at the blockchain level... so yeah,ok.... sorry!!!!
https://steemit.com/steem/@fow/aggressively-forcing-sbd-peg-by-adjusting-feed-bias-witness-digression
:blushes:
sorry for arguing in circles with you.
but bias doesn't effect the price feed, only the way that rewards are handled... which is what I thought, until I read this article just now
https://steemit.com/witness-category/@timcliff/witness-voting-guide
which states that the bias is a way to effect how conversions are handled, and says nothing of how rewards are handled... I guess I'm going to do more reserach... the whitepaper has nothing on bias :(
That's because the white paper only mentions the feed price. Bias is just a convenient way of expressing how much we are deviating from market price.
Everything in the block chain uses the feed price to convert to and from steem and sbd.
I should mention I had this same confusion when comparing the white paper to steemd witness page settings and the bias discussion.
faaaak my brain doesn't wrap around the maths as well as I'd like it to... much thanks to you for your previous work, and now for helping me closer to understanding.
Yay @eonwarped that's our genius and as I can see so many people go to you! You will be a mill before all of us and well deserved too. xoxo