You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: The Number of Smartasses on Steemit is Growing!
While I thought this post was good, albeit lacking because a blind item and most people wouldn’t know what makes a good or bad witness (proof: see Jerry’s sheeple), when I got to the comments it got even better.
We urgently need to find a way to start campaigning for the witnesses, for the good ones, in order to educate the community. Because voting, as a process, is flawed if voters aren’t educated. And self-campaigning is flawed by nature, obviously.
The best way to vote for witnesses is 15 good ones and 15 bad ones that way there is an equal amount of honesty. If you vote one crowd all selling the same kool-aid you get blind-sided when they make decisions. If you keep things balanced you get narks and tattle-tails pointing fingers and that leads to more truth. You'd be a sheep to vote in all of them spewing the same story and even blinder than someone who votes for Jerry.
I would agree with this, especially since I come from typical coalition based nations (rather than bipartisan systems).
But in a DPOS setup this is detrimental since it will constantly delay achieving consensus.
The beauty of DPOS is that it’s a liquid system and voting can be changed again whenever.
Yeah I also went to fetch the popcorns for the commenting section... love to see people arguing like this.