You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Community Decisions to Establish Rules vs. "It's in the Code = LAW", and the Battle for Decentralization
Sadly the people that most likely would benefit from this discussion with you have long ago stopped reading what you write. They have instead started posting memes about whining about unfairness and of course calling people that challenge them trolls. I don't actually know if some of them have the reading comprehension to read something like this. There are some that do, and hopefully they will refrain from simply ignoring you.
Why would I need to read another rambling like this.
Headline says: decentralization; bottomline says: give the community more power.
You fail to realize that the inflated payouts krnel received were simply the result of dan voting for krnel with his massive stake. Once others noticed that, they auto-voted for krnel too.
You'd have to be a special type of delusional to think that those post would have made those huge payouts if it wasn't for dan's votes. The result of a centralized system.
Call my ignorant all you like.
If you need to make 10+ posts, pages long, over the same point again and again I wouldn't call that intelligent, either.
Yup, I know. All they have is ridicule and mockery from a position of ignorance since they lack understanding and the will to learn by reading. It's like my posts that got flagged and called of "no value" when the person doesn't even understand the content lol.
Awesome post !!! Im in full agreement of course !!! Lol! This current system needs a major overhaul to say the least ! And soon!!! People are leaving and not coming on board to begin with , my 2 sons now 27 and 30 wont join because of the lopsidedness if thats a word lol , and the constant downvoteing of posts !! I myself have totally decided to cut back on my posting because if i ever get a good reward maybe once a month , it gets downvoted because im aparently draining the rewards pool !! Its a joke really ! Anyways keep up the great work ! End of rant !! Lol !😉👍😆
Yeah it sucks. The problem was there, and slowly building in people dissatisfaction. The centralization of power has been there for a while and people just take it because thats the way it is, some have left because they thought this would stay forever and would lead to failure in the end. What we have now are more symptoms of the underlying issue. But with vote delegation, we can turn this whole thing around and make Steemit a real success by giving the power to the people who use the site, while giving the stakeholders the curation. Then people won't feel disempowered in their votes and in how the majority of rewards are allocated. It won't be based on 30-50 whales.
Well that sounds great to me !! But i will believe it when i see it !! 👍😉
Motions and bullshit, your crap means nothing, and I can prove it. Mere platitudes: I am not a developer so it's not my department, then why the fuck are you even expressing your support for something you have no comprehension of? Exactly.
all this push for change is happening inside a tiny bubble that large stakeholders don't care about, in the short term very little will change and steemit power will continue to be centralized, the only way it will become decentralized is when there are 10,000 active users per day as a result of steemit inc marketing, and that's months from now
Ok mr I view flagging as a private matter on a completely transparent system, you're playing the prophet now, after this it will be what? Support me on the next cryptocurrency associate siphoning vblog?
The only way, inside a tiny bubble, what other don't care about, very little will change, all inconsequential opinions, prove me wrong. O wait, I'll have to for the prophetic troll of mental midget status to.
You also supported the irrationality that @craig-grant was posting just a few days ago, I challanged him again and again and it's obvious he is a mental midget, happy to ride the whalecock of bernei and smooth, so your support comes with the hypocrisy of applauding a mental midget.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@craig-grant/steemit-flagging-to-reduce-rewards-it-s-great#@baah/re-craig-grant-re-robertmacdonald-re-craig-grant-re-robertmacdonald-re-craig-grant-steemit-flagging-to-reduce-rewards-it-s-great-20170226t065452135z
Once again! ARE YOU ON CRACK !?!?!?
Once again? Is that your fail at holding count, and what does me being on crack have to do with my arguments? Can you not attack my argument only my person? Exclamate away
Since you vote for yourself I only have to laugh at how imbecilic you truly are and I highly doubt that anything you say is worth shit, you Invalidate yourself left and right and have no problem lying and like the hypocrite you are you offer your opinion on something that you said you don't have the grasp of, wowza, please don't run with scissors, but then again who will really miss someone that lies left and right, is a fucking hypocrite and gives their opinions on matters they have no comprehension of, PLATITUDE AWAY with all the exclamations you feel require the non-thoughts you're undoubtedly gonna vomit, every asshole has an opinion.
so sexy :)
The truth hurts grant, you can bet you ass that your comment defines you as a troll in this circumstance, but before you have proven that you're incapable of answering a simple and serious question, and an equal shameful inability to offer your rational for it. You are a mental midget, you are a troll. You consider yourself whatever you want but the facts are there on the blockchain.
Everyones entitled to their own opinion ! You have not read alot if not most of what ive been against ! Name calling is going to get you no where on steemit ! I have never called anyone names no matter how much i disagree with how they operate or how the system is set up in a way that makes them do what what they do because they feel there is no other way !! What im saying now and have been saying for some time is that that the system needs an overhaul of some kind in order to bennifit all steemians on the platform ! Not just some !! A big change is needed before more people will join steemit and less people will leave !! This is not my department im not a Dev !! But im sure they can come up with a way thats suitable for all of us !!
Let me reiterate it again:
You support craig-grant, which I did asses as a mental midget, which means exactly that: you support his opinions which are GRATING to the mind of any discernible thinker and no ammount of exclamation will change that!!!!
need I break down his video WORD BY WORD to show how irrational and retarded it is? Challenge Accepted.
To begin with he states that he thinks that curation is perfect, BUT it needs to be managed better, retarded point number 1.
Then he states that he read a post, SCRATCH that, he scanned over a post.
Retarded point number deux.
He calls is Complaining. His scanned post assessment leads him to conclude that krnel was complaining, not making valid arguments, complaining. Great one so sexy, i have fun all the time and cannot answer one question and everyone is entitled to their opinion but gdawg forbid you call them out for being assholes, mental midgets, imbeciles because you don't condone that, like your opinion is so much more valuable when there's 7 billions of them walking around.
So number 4, he concluded complaining after admitting to not reading the post, moron, retard, mental midget. The blockchain remembers, I can see your facial expressions and the complete discomfort you are in expressing opinions, speak your mind bro, don't look like you're taking a shit every time you enunciate something.
The number one reason he thinks flagging is for: to reduce rewards, a point you wholehearted say you support. What do you say about that?
Let's not count that as a whole point in the imbecile dumbass section, just a larf of a half.
4.5
He finally has a reason to do something negative, finally: assholes cannot wait to jump on negatives they perceive as positive.
5.5 for the asshole.
6.5- because they are always on the trending page, retarded logic again.
7.5 points now for being a moron imbecile- because they are great at blogging.
8.5 he admints he is part of the problem "even my bot, I am another asshole that supports great content with my bot and that means his work, krnel's great, hard work (o wait work is not in his dictionary but he speaks about work) needs to be punished because I am a moron and my opinion overrules morality
9.5 well the rewards are pretty spread out, invalidating himself 2 seconds after he tried to make a point that krnel is taking in EVERYONE'S money.
awesome sauce moron retard imbecile unable to form one valid thought, read that again, ONE VALID THOUGHT, UNABLE TO FORM ONE VALID THOUGHT, proof in the blockchain.
10.5 it's not good to see the same user every single day..
Need I continue, I literally had to grate my brain for two and a half minutes out of almost 7 minutes of imbecile opinionated drivel.
Yes, you support exactly who, exclamation mark ensue in 3. 2. 1.
" I have never called anyone names no matter how much i disagree with how they operate"
Did you not ask me if I was on crack, or you believe that is not name calling you imbecilic non-thought? Obviously you have no problem calling me a crack head you dumbass, at least don't invalidate your comment by lying you fucking hypocrite liar.
You are now muted !!!
Calling me a crack head and then you mute me, how quaint of the imbecility you ascribe to.
I read it.
Hehe, that wasn't target at you. :)
Well, I am part of that clique. I'm one of the bad guys.
Yes, but this is not the purpose of the flag. You could argue semantics over what constitutes abuse, what constitutes spam, etc. I believe plagiarism is pretty cut and dried.
The adding of the words about if you think the rewards are too high DID indeed open the subjective flood gates.
Oh are you subjectively down voting people? Also, are you one of those saying "I didn't read it" and then deciding to bash and attack anyway?
If you are reasonable and you actually read it, then you were not whom I am referring to. Disagreement is fine and healthy.
Every vote I've given on this platform, be it upvote or downvote, has been subjective. Just like every other vote ever given.
No other types of votes exist. Value is subjective.