Sort:  

And I am saying, why do you think this platform should reward bloggers who have invested little or no money with enough compensation to consider it a full time job?

Payouts and rewards are for getting cryptocurrency into more people's hands, through 'proof of brain', not for fairly compensating content.

You have to build your presence on here, invest in more steem power so you have more voting power, this attracts others to you and you grow organically. Obviously the better content the more potential rewards you will get, but no one is owed anything. This is an experiment, one you have an opportunity to be a big part of, but it takes time.

The actual social media aspect of steem should be looked at as influencers and companies creating there individual marketing and advertising campaigns, and will be where a majority of author rewards will be generated from simply because they will have invested the most $ into powering up Steem.

why do you think this platform should reward bloggers who have invested little or no money with enough compensation to consider it a full time job?

Because having invested a lot doesn't mean that your posts are any good. I'd rather see someone rewarded who has put effort into his posts.

Payouts and rewards are for getting cryptocurrency into more people's hands, through 'proof of brain', not for fairly compensating content.

Uhm what? Proof of brain means that posts should get rewards for the merit they offer, not because the author has invested a lot.

You have to build your presence on here, invest in more steem power so you have more voting power, this attracts others to you and you grow organically.

I somewhat disagree, sure you have to build your presence, like on any other platform, but you don't need to invest anything. I very much enjoy @steevc's content for example and he hasn't invested a dime in powering up. Does his content not deserve any rewards because he hasn't invested? That's just one example.

Also, you talk about 'organic growth', if you need to invest in order to grow, that's literally the opposite of organic growth.

The actual social media aspect of steem should be looked at as influencers and companies creating there individual marketing and advertising campaigns, and will be where a majority of author rewards will be generated from simply because they will have invested the most $ into powering up Steem.

That's where I completely disagree. You want a system that's completely pay to play? A platform where the whales get all the votes, just because they're colluding with each other to make themselves and their friends richer?

You're entitled to that opinion of course, but we aren't going to see mass adoption with that mindset. Imagine if people had to spend thousands of dollars, just to get an account on Medium or otherwise their posts wouldn't be seen by anyone. yeah I don't think that's such a great system.

I'm not saying that people shouldn't get any return on their investment, but that's supposedly what curation rewards are for.

This is not my opinion. This is from the mouth of the creator of Steemit and the Steem blockchain @ned in a video he posted last week.

Proof of brain is just proof you are a brain, not that you write intelligently. He says this is his concept because eventually it gets more people to have ANY amount of crypto.

Also, organic means without spending money on advertising for growth.

All of your stated opinions are 'what you would rather see', I am just giving you the reality of it.

It is not about what I want, it is what it is.

Here is the video on the current state of affairs of Steemit, it is over an hour long but somewhere towards the middle/end he talks about proof-of-brain and all of his intentions.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@ned/third-test-livestream-steemit-update

Invest in steemit and upvote your own comments, such added value

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.27
TRX 0.11
JST 0.030
BTC 71353.04
ETH 3819.08
USDT 1.00
SBD 3.51