RE: I Have A Question: Are We Willing To Punish New Users To Combat Spam?
If I remember correctly, the limit is simply a function of how the blockchain works. Adding something to the blockchain creates work, that work must be compensated somehow. The SP is that compensation (indirectly), demonstrating that the poster has a vested interest in the long term value of the platform.
I do think there is a possible solution here in getting new users and avoiding mindless spam.... but I haven't given enough thought to it. I know there was a post the other day discussing this. @timcliff maybe?
That said -- people aren't "charged bitcoin" to participate. Steem tokens are on their own blockchain. Purchasing with BTC is one method, but there are other means of exchange, just no direct from USD yet.
Further -- those are allocated to EVERYONE that invests. This isn't a centralized model. The @steemit account has plenty in reserves to pay employees. The only reason a token is worth what it is right now is because the COMMUNITY of investors and participants have deemed it to be worth that much, in the open market. If they deemed it worthless, it would be free to post and eventually the blockchain would die from lack of interest and witnesses.
In the chat today a user gifted another in this circumstance steem to power up to avoid the training wheels issue. According to the user with the training wheels issue they couldn't power it up and reimbursed the gifter.
When the gifter transfered as SP it worked fine.
So I'm not sure what the deal is. What do you think may have caused this?
The "training wheels" user stated there was an error message when trying to convert the gifted steem to SP.
well said, but I would argue witnesses wouldn't leave, they stayed for a year with almost no pay from this. Still I'm not sure