You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Third Test Livestream; Steemit Update
Why doesn't it need to be done? Have you read the literature on game theory and how punishment and rewards NEED to go together so that certain behaviors can be curbed? You can make any asserting nonsense you wish that people have the option of not rewarding but any and all good curation systems function exclusively outside the lalaland of "positive reviews". You finagled your way now, into denying any meaningful use for flagging, so why do you want a committee anyway?
Posted using Partiko Android
In terms of abuse or censorship....you don't get to claim that this is a decentralized platform prohibitive of censorship then give everyone the right not only to censor but to also enable them to stalk and censor you into oblivion if they so choose, it's the most totalitarian form of censorship on the planet as it stands on it's current grounds. There is no MSM force or blog site that allows for punitive damages of comments, I can see it use as it pertains to abuse of the terms of service but you will never get me to agree that people should lose their revenue just because someone opposed or had a different opinion on a subject, or that it is continue to be allowed go beyond a comment and strike down everything that person may comment or post for as long as the offended so desires. You are way off course in regards to comparison of censorship styles there is nobody worse then Steemit.
You cannot call curation censorship, you cannot call censorship rating. You clearly don't understand what censorship is and isn't.
It's not revenue, its VOTING ON REWARDS.
Unfortunately, this discussion is going absolutely nowhere if you don't want to put forth why and how curation is censorship or why and how voting on rewards is revenue. You also didn't answer if you understood the reason and rationale behind flagging or punishment, it seems you hardly address the entirety of my comments OR bother to explain why work curated as hidden by default, with a conspicuous button that at once ANYONE can click to reveal the content curated as hidden, is tantamount to censorship or explain how and why it's the worst kind/style of censorship. The best part is that you have to continue to resort to painting an otherwise benign or neutral act as sensational as possible, calling freedom of expression as the worst kind of censorship, freedom to curate an active post or comment as "losing of revenue" and otherwise referring to the right for everyone to curate, review/rate as the most totalitarian form of censorship, which hardly seem totalitarian or censorship but you're convinced it seem that somefuckingway
We
Are
Comparing
Censorship Styles.
We are discussing your confusion, confusion which you think will sustain if you keep repeating it it seems.
Posted using Partiko Android
Okay let me put it as simply as I possibly can for you. Lets say you work for someone, that person says under the terms of your employment that you may lose portions of your wages if he finds you discuss or make comments at work that he disagree's with. He finds out you made a comment he doesn't like so his strikes a buck off your hourly wage that day, then he happens to learn that four days ago you also made a comment he doesn't like so he comes back and says I am also going to strike a buck off your wages from four days ago, then he realized a few days later you have repeated your comment or have engaged in other comments he doesn't like and he strikes more money off your hourly wages....just how long do you think you will continue to try and be productive under those circumstances when he can just repeatedly ride your ass?
You work for yourself, you're comparing a salary working for someone with at best working for yourself and generally a hobby or outlet, and trying to say that people shouldn't have a say over removing rewards, only allocating them and because you think somehow you put it simply by arguing that it would not be productive for someone to work under terms where their employer can strike off wages for making unfavorable comments as if that is anything comparable to what voting on rewards is.
Posted using Partiko Android
Exactly why I don't put forth a genuine effort to write quality material, it only takes one person to get upset about a comment on a unrelated post to come and strike down rewards off unrelated post on my blog that could have taken me hours to write. It ain't worth it, I earned it and they have no right to take it. Period. This place is failing because it's a echo chamber and I am not the only one who has a opinion on that, there are plenty of others...maybe you'd like to go say a few words to them, you can start here:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@shepz1/i-just-bought-some-steem-riddle-me-this-newbie-guide-to-steemit#@sunlit7/re-shepz1-i-just-bought-some-steem-riddle-me-this-newbie-guide-to-steemit-20181206t064318470z
You only earn the good curation but not the bad. You only earn the good reputation but not the bad. Period.
Posted using Partiko Android