I was ready to argue that this will be good not bad but you're right. What we're doing right now is creating a gilded age of Steem where a few huge users control all the power, with the majority being given the illusion of power but not actually having it should they go against a huge user. It's a hard problem to solve.
I read it yesterday, thanks for the comment.... lets's hope it is not that bad... why they cant let it like it is? HF 18 for me so far worked good! And like you said in your post: Change ONE Component at a time..... thanks @aggroed, like your post.
HF 18 only sorta works because all the whales backed out of voting, which isn't quite fair to them either. So, behind teh programming aspect is an extremely important voting culture thing that has to be unwound too.
Enjoyed mulling over your take on this yesterday.
Let's hope, if you're right, HF20+ gets us closer to the target.
(And the community here is patient.)
Let's hope there's still a community by then :)
I was ready to argue that this will be good not bad but you're right. What we're doing right now is creating a gilded age of Steem where a few huge users control all the power, with the majority being given the illusion of power but not actually having it should they go against a huge user. It's a hard problem to solve.
I read it yesterday, thanks for the comment.... lets's hope it is not that bad... why they cant let it like it is? HF 18 for me so far worked good! And like you said in your post: Change ONE Component at a time..... thanks @aggroed, like your post.
HF 18 only sorta works because all the whales backed out of voting, which isn't quite fair to them either. So, behind teh programming aspect is an extremely important voting culture thing that has to be unwound too.