You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Reinventing the Role of Steemhunt Influencers | Sponsor Report - #23
Its bullshit, ive help support steemhunt for 3 months. Upvoted atleast 10 a day. So what i have 46 reputation, i dont upvote myself and you know its impossible to get anyone to see posts if your not buying bot votes which i dont believe is right. Also ive only done 3 steemhunt posts because everytime i found something someone already did it lol and i prefered to just uovote the posts i thought were good.
I could just upvote myself get to 50 and find 7 more steemhunts quick that wernt great and id be allegable. Its bullshit. Atleast im honest.
Id like to be an influencer, im always on the site, so would be good to be useful too but im not going to just cheat to win like many.
Hey Liam, I have to disagree with you there... if you submitted good hunts you'd quickly rise in reputation because the Steemhunt system has quite a high reputation itself. Otherwise; writing pieces that get upvoted by Curie or Utopian... or producing a video for Dtube or answering questions for Musing.io are all great ways to get some bigger upvotes and increase your reputation. I disagree with the use of bidbots too, it's extremely hard to "win" with those guys.
there is far too many people posting good content for a few upvoting campaigns to see. Its why only 50-60k of people out of 1.1 million accounts are active because they come in hope of earning a little and very rarely does it happen. Only big steem power holders can really earn or early adopters of free smt coins like steemhunt itself. So many witnesses even admit to this so I'm glad your so optimistic but realistically, its only a few who get success. Steemhunt is great but Steemit rep isn't a good way of seeing how good a user is like I said but thats just my 2 cents, Steemhunt will do good either way, just think there must be a better way of choosing applicants.