You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: What of (exactly) and why am I being accused and attacked about, and what is fair resolution?
In addition ANY AND ALL BETS made at 1% made by ALL USERS need to be paid up until the time you changed the rules.
Any funds unpaid because of this have been stolen by you. You don't get to purposefully build a flaw into the system, keep the money and then play the victim.
How so? Any and all winners that have ever been paid have voted 50% or more on the main post and comment as ALWAYS been required.
What I have a stolen?
What money is being kept?
and why are you victimizing me!?
You changed the rules to 50% after people started flagging you. Stop pretending you don't know what I'm talking about.
You owe everyone who bet anything and upvoted the winner.
Also what about all the other complaints?
Stop playing the victim and calculate what you owe!
The rules has been 50% forever. Anyone who has ever won and been paid has voted 50% or more on the main post and the comment. Stop the false accusations of fraud / scam because you failed to vote 50%. I'm not playing victim. I've constantly offered to work on a solution when you define the exact problem.
nope sorry. you changed the rules after you got flagged. then you said the rules had always been that. read my post again. this is already settled.
You're being consistently dishonest about this and you know it. Here's the source for your rules.
Specifically, where and when did you list the 50% vote strength rule? And, making the same point i did in the other thread. Flagging him makes you look guilty as hell.
It doesnt matter if you only paid some winners who votes a certain percent in the past, or if the rule has been in your vote scrtipt since the beginning. If you didnt specify the rule, explicitly, then you didn't have the rule.
If that has always been the rule, but you werent writing that rule into the posts, then you were running a dishonest game.
Thats the definition of a dishonest game. One where the rules written down that the player can read differ from the actaual rules.
For example, if i runa gambling game with the rule (that i don't write down anywhere) that people who have a screen name beginning with the letter "V" are ineligible for payout... thats fine (even though its a dumb rule). As long as its explicitly stated. If i run the game with the rule, and its not stated explicitly, then thats dishonest.
Everyone who voted 50+% since the beginning were the ones who won and were paid for winning. That has always been the rule.