I'm so glad to see someone taking this position. It is this kind of thinking that build a great future. I fully agree with the things you've said. I've been a follower of @haejin since the time he was making only few dollars per post. He even had a lottery where he picked 5 people (3 based on votes and 2 randomly) and coached them 1 on 1. He used to upvote and reply. Even few weeks ago he had randomly upvoted this post: https://steemit.com/health/@vimukthi/hygiene-alert-you-could-be-flushing-your-toilet-wrong-and-you-ll-need-to-re-think-your-habits-and-where-you-keep-your-toothbrush of mine which he should have randomly come across.

I've also made 2 posts relevant to the topic: https://steemit.com/steemit/@vimukthi/a-philosophical-and-economic-outlook-at-steemit-sbd-and-flagging-and-suggestions-for-a-better-future-based-on-positive

https://steemit.com/steemit/@vimukthi/steemit-feature-request-we-need-to-have-a-dislike-button-separate-from-flags-for-better-online-interactions-according-to-game

They didn't get much attention at all. The votes are mostly from the funds I spent promoting the posts. Basically it all comes down to fixing things at the protocol level. I talked more about this in the comment section here: https://steemit.com/steemit/@lexiconical/flagging-bot-users-arbitrarily-is-like-arresting-those-paying-protection-money-to-the-mob

Thanks a lot for being a sensible and peaceful person on the blockchain. Many people actually left the platform when they were caught in these destructive wars. There was a downvote campaign by bcc, done btu accounts that downvoted people for simply voting for @haejin I think I myself lost over $100. Some might have lost even more.

That's not real community building. Personally I've pretty much stopped voting for @haejin after he stopped posting crypto TA as I personally don't find any value in non-crypto posts (with few exceptions here and there). But I do believe in people's right decide on what is useful for them.

Thanks again for posting!