You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Improving the Economics of Steem: A Community Proposal
No need to ask Steemit, stop worshiping them.
- Linear curve is not flawed
- Very fast but what curve you want?
- You'll get to downvote for free very soon, so if you upvote yourself in excess on stupid content you'l most likely get downvoted.
- Can shower yourself in virtue signaling.
- Estimates on what? Your bogus claim?
- Calculate that yourself if you think it's relevant.
- It's not flawed and it was approved by witness voted by all stakeholders.
- "Where did explain why it weren't flawed anymore before" WTF?
- Because it's his only contribution to Steem this last year beside self-voting with his huge stake.
Read the downvote section again. I like to think it's mostly my suggestion and I'm not bragging about it because it's so obviously the solution to people buying votes on half baked comments like this one.
Have a look at this poll, seems by the votes to far, I think all these options need to truly be carefully considered before implementing measures that make passive stake holders move to even more disruptive use of their stake.
What are you alluding to? My comment is super critical of Steemit.
Steemit Inc said linear rewards were flawed. They then supported linear rewards while never explaining why they weren't flawed, "anymore".
What's your goal to shame steemit retroactively?
I've been talking against linear reward since at least november 2017. I want a change as soon as possible to something nit fundamentally flawed.
o_o
https://steemit.com/joy/@teamsteem/i-saw-your-dance-video-and-now-i-know-your-rich
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=165&v=4qE0SGgWU1w