Did @ned Just Give Insight Into Another SMT????

in #steem6 years ago (edited)

@ned dropped a hint in a post yesterday that certainly caused some speculation.

Secret Steem Advantage?

Bandwidth delegation pools?

Could this be something that is going to be implemented?

A while back one of the developers talked about the way they were changing the bandwidth and how it operated. With the impending introduction of SMTs, the bandwidth allocation is a great focus. Part of the change was giving those who are in charge of their particular SMTs the ability to decide when to conduct some transactions. In other words, they are creating a metric to denote what bandwidth basically "costs" at a given point based upon network activity.

When the network is busy, the cost is high. During down times, the price of bandwidth will drop.

Of course, this is not true buying since it is all based upon how much bandwidth a project has. If there is more activity for that SMT than it has, transactions are delayed until bandwidth "recharges". The option to purchase more bandwidth by buying STEEM is also available.

Now we get this bombshell.

Bandwidth delegation on the STEEM blockchain!!!!

To start, this is a great idea in that it better utilizes the bandwidth on the blockchain. Think about it, outside the rare newbie who upvotes everything in sight, few of us use the bandwidth allocated to us. It is akin to the mindset about the automobile. Most cars sit 22-23 hours a day. The average person uses his or her car a couple hours a day.

Bandwidth is the same. Few of us put the MBs or GBs to use. With the coming SMTs, there will be a lot of call for bandwidth. Why not use what is already here?

The second aspect to this is classical blockchain/token mindset. Everything can be turned into an liquid asset. By providing the opportunity to delegate one's bandwidth, this provides the ability to earn some tokens off it if one chooses. Since the SMT creators will need to acquire the bandwidth via STEEM purchase anyway, having a pool for them to tap into only makes sense.

This is even better for STEEM hodlers since, under this plan, the acquisition of the bandwidth via STEEM is a rental of sorts. The bandwidth is still owned by the Steemian.

So how is one paid?

This is where it gets speculative and interesting. One way, in my mind, is to have one get paid in STEEM. Just like some people pay fees for delegation from certain individuals, one could get a rental fee for the use of the bandwidth.

Another way is to have a SMT designed just for bandwidth. This opens up a host of possibilities. We already saw this idea used by @actifit and @steemhunt. By delegating one's bandwidth, the SMT token is earned each day based upon a specified payout schedule.

An alternative could be to have this pool take in all the "fees" from the SMT users over a specific period, a day or a week, and then split it up to all those who delegated based upon percentage of bandwidth contributed. Hence, the system is self-funding from the revenues.

The last few days seem to have many of us focusing upon Steem Power (MVests) in our discussions. This is another reason why powering up is so important. Only SP can be delegated (unless something is changed in the future). So those hodling STEEM outside of SP will not be able to participate. This provides even more incentive to power up since it increases one's bandwidth.

I am not sure if this is STEEM's secret advantage but it is something I never heard about before. In fact, it is a creative idea. This also exemplifies how we are going to see a ton of ingenuity in the blockchain world over the next decade. Tokens offer unlimited possibilities.

What is the motivation for this? Is it better allocation of the bandwidth on the blockchain? I believe there is a part in that idea. Perhaps this is providing insight into the mindset of the development team and how much traffic they believe will be on here. The last thing anyone needs is for applications to become popular yet their users constantly having to wait to interact because of bandwidth issues.

Also, as @abh12345, @preparedwombat, and myself covered in articles that were posted/linked in the last couple days, STEEM is going to be a rare commodity over the next two decades. This means that it is going to be harder to garner SP which should send the price of STEEM upward. This is good for hodlers of the token but could price new applications off the STEEM blockchain. Look at it this way, how many startups are going to join here if it will cost them $100K in STEEM just to provide enough bandwidth to their users?

The delegation pool alleviates this. Unused bandwidth can be delegated providing SP hodlers a return while offering new SMT projects a way to get what they need in a cost effective manner.

It does appear that there is another revenue stream being developed for all accounts with over the basic 15 SP.

Relax grasshopper, we are just getting started here.

If you found this article interesting, please give it an upvote and resteem.


To receive the free basic income tokens you are entitled to and help end world wide poverty, please click the following:

Click For Manna Coins

In full disclosure this is a referral link

image.png

Pictures by Google Images

Sort:  

How this make as another SMT

Yet more interesting developments on the Steem blockchain!

Still early days here isn't it, but the clues are that Steem Power will become (and should be thought of now) the most important asset.

Thanks for the info.

It does appear the incentives to power up (i.e. invest in the STEEM blockchain) just keep growing.

We have years to run yet while the dust (or SP) settles - I'm keeping a tight hold!

The Steem price is so low, that we do not have to worry about this. First SMTs than delegation pools 6 to 12 months later.

Hello! Congratulations on creating a blog on Steemit, I'm glad to get acquainted! I followed you and will help develop your blog, but I want you to follow me too, let's develop blogs together! ;)

I am confused, is bandwidth delegation different from sp delegation?? If so is bandwidth delegation even possible right now??

This sounds very interesting but other than users who have recently joined, does anyone else really need any extra bandwidth? And with what funds would new users repay the bandwidth delegated to them?

I think the idea is not for those on Steemit now but the SMTs and anticipated traffic that comes long with it. If you have 50M people joining the blockchain, that is a lot of bandwidth required. Bandwidth has to be purchased by the SMT creators to cover the usage. This, naturally, could send the price flying with enough buying pressure.

Hence the idea of using bandwidth that is already in people's hands but unused. You are correct, most but the newest of newbies has extra bandwidth. So it is not individuals perse who need it but the SMTs in general.

thanks for clearing that up!

So interesting to watch all this unfold and exciting to be a part of it.

To listen to the audio version of this article click on the play image.

Brought to you by @tts. If you find it useful please consider upvoting this reply.

I saw this yesterday and it felt rather cryptic, or am I missing something?

One thing you mention is the scarcity of Steem in the upcoming years. Do you know if the Steem burnt now means less Steem is produced, since Steem's inflation rate is a percentage, not a flat percentage.

So if we have let's say 1000 total supply, we will produce 90 Steem, but if we had 900 total supply because 10% of Steem was burnt, would we only produce 81% in the rewards pool/inflation?

I am not sure about the burn but I would presume that if STEEM was burnt, the amount produced would be lowered since it is a percentage of the total.

But that is just a guess on my part.

I would assume the same! I'll ask around and tell you when I get a concrete answer :)

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63407.49
ETH 2645.11
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.81