You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Suggestion for a Proposal Structure for @steemalliance - Evergreen Funding
Since this proposal involves a code change to the blockchain, it would have to be accepted by the witnesses even after it's voted in by the people.
Yes. I note that there aren't many mechanisms I've seen discussed that won't require a HF. I actually can only think of two, and those are both already being employed: direct funding with stake, as Stinc has been, and via upvoting periodic posts, as Steemchiller (and others) do.
Given the history of application of stake to date on Steem, I am not particularly optimistic that other mechanisms than I propose will fail to reduce incentives to join and invest in Steem.
Thanks!
This feels remarkably similar to the worker proposal system / DAO that's already in progress. Would that be enough to do what you propose?
This is my proposal for effecting exactly that, in fact.