In my opinion, we need to stop seeing Steem as one thing and start visualizing it much more like the internet at large, which has all kinds of content with most being completely uninteresting and useless to a single individual. You might be interested in watching Two girls, one cup but it doesn't mean everyone has to be, nor does it have to appear at the top of Trending on @dtaste. This is the internet, Steem is the blockchained internet.

Steem is diverse, we cannot always achieve or reach a consensus as regards what is classified as a quality rather we can promote steem with the uniqueness in various decentralized applications. What works as a great and quality content on @dtube platform maybe a thrash or irrelevant on @steemmonsters game site. Would that made “monstusers” bias towards quality content? The answer is No, in the same vein @taskmasters4450 POV would be relevant assuming steemIT & every other dapps isn't on a chain. But nevertheless, he has got some point though - how do we juxtapose value created and quality added to the chain?