Friend @fucho80 I congratulate you is an excellent topic that you bring up.
Of course, the changes were good in both aspects but only a few are equally affected in a positive way, and others in a negative way.
Positively, many with great voting power are carrying out healing manually. They don't care about the 5 minutes to vote since they will take the best slice with their high voting power.
As for the negative, it is two things, one still has good authors but they do not see a reward for their work and on the other hand the negative votes they are giving, although it is 10% even it looks very bad that one is voted for negative way.
Now those who are still standing is because we like to be here, many did not know how to withstand the pressure, so they grab their bags and leave.
So friend to continue publishing and inviting people to join
a big hug, buddy.
Hello dear @lanzjoseg, thanks for participating.
Okay friend, that's a really good thing, manual healing has also made us participate more often in important votes, which is beneficial for everyone.
This negative feedback is the most awkward thing I could experience at this time.
Thanks for your comment!