This annoys me. I've never gotten into Wikipedia article editing, but what gives someone the right to 'undo' changes? Do you have to be a 'VIP' user or something? Or claim some special knowledge on a topic? The user who is undoing these changes seems to be a film fanatic more than a crypto expert.
I knew someone who has a high standing on Wikipedia in general since he was there since the beginning, if that's the way to get the Steem changes through I might send him a message and see if he can update the Wiki for us.
it was because of the self-referential use of sources. It can be fixed by using independent and steem-external sources. We only used steem - GitHub, steem.center, steemit, steem.com, whitepaper, blue-paper, larimer-articles ....this clearly introduces a bias. I wouldn't try to make them angry, Wikipedia is a use-full generator for traffic. The Steemit article went through because it contains critical sources. It was a mistake from us, not from them.
holger80 made an important step towards article-diversity, there are other important sites and wikis where it is easier.
Thanks for the clarification @lauch3d! I was afraid 'bias' was into play here since I've heard of Steemians trying to update the wiki before and it getting rejected for no apparent good reason. This sounds reasonable, and more importantly, fixable :-)
You need a EOS account and IQ. The IQ must be staked to receive BRAIN. Each editing approach consumes 50 BRAIN. Each iteration is then open for 6 hours and other user can reject are accept changes:
Yes, steemit.com is really great, fast and user friendly in comparison to everipedia ;). The editor is a pain and needed to edit the same changes several times...
In any case, you keep doing great stuff @holger80, not only for the promotion of steem! By far one of the most skillful devs/ witnesses around. Hats off
You just got a 2.6% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 7.320 which ranks you at #65 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 1 places in the last three days (old rank 64).
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 227 contributions, your post is ranked at #2. Congratulations!
This annoys me. I've never gotten into Wikipedia article editing, but what gives someone the right to 'undo' changes? Do you have to be a 'VIP' user or something? Or claim some special knowledge on a topic? The user who is undoing these changes seems to be a film fanatic more than a crypto expert.
I knew someone who has a high standing on Wikipedia in general since he was there since the beginning, if that's the way to get the Steem changes through I might send him a message and see if he can update the Wiki for us.
There was a reason cited, mainly about notability. I didn't dig too deeply but maybe such things can be resolved or argued for on the discussion page
Posted using Partiko Android
Thanks! @lauch3d stated the more detailed reasons below, didn't sound like an unreasonable rejection which was what I was afraid of :-)
it was because of the self-referential use of sources. It can be fixed by using independent and steem-external sources. We only used steem - GitHub, steem.center, steemit, steem.com, whitepaper, blue-paper, larimer-articles ....this clearly introduces a bias. I wouldn't try to make them angry, Wikipedia is a use-full generator for traffic. The Steemit article went through because it contains critical sources. It was a mistake from us, not from them.
holger80 made an important step towards article-diversity, there are other important sites and wikis where it is easier.
Thanks for the clarification @lauch3d! I was afraid 'bias' was into play here since I've heard of Steemians trying to update the wiki before and it getting rejected for no apparent good reason. This sounds reasonable, and more importantly, fixable :-)
Congratulations @holger80! You received a personal award!
Thank you for taking part in the early access of Drugwars.
You can view your badges on your Steem Board and compare to others on the Steem Ranking
Do not miss the last post from @steemitboard:
Vote for @Steemitboard as a witness to get one more award and increased upvotes!
Wow, that sounds user friendly :-/
Thank you for putting Steem on there though! \0/
Yes, steemit.com is really great, fast and user friendly in comparison to everipedia ;). The editor is a pain and needed to edit the same changes several times...
:') Ugh. We need Everipedia on Steem.
Was about to say the exact same thing.
In any case, you keep doing great stuff @holger80, not only for the promotion of steem! By far one of the most skillful devs/ witnesses around. Hats off
Thanks for promoting Steem on Everipedia @holger80. Great work as always.
Hi, @holger80!
You just got a 2.6% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
Thank you so much for participating in the Partiko Delegation Plan Round 1! We really appreciate your support! As part of the delegation benefits, we just gave you a 3.00% upvote! Together, let’s change the world!
Thanks mate!
A few days ago the Everipedia founder spread FUD about Steem on podcast so im mostly staying away from anything related to that site.
Good work! That will help the newcomers to Steem. Snax wants Steem to grow, and to become larger than ever before. We want to help Steem by letting people earn more money on their posts, with Snax and without leaving Steem or other socials:
https://steemit.com/steemit/@snaxteam/decentralizing-social-media-rewards-steem-and-snax-comparison
Hi @holger80!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 7.320 which ranks you at #65 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has dropped 1 places in the last three days (old rank 64).
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 227 contributions, your post is ranked at #2. Congratulations!
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server