The Next Million Steemians
Recently I was posed the following question: "What needs to happen before the Steem platform can become a successful economic system?"
That is to say, "when moon?" but being more specific about what that looks like. It already assumes that the end goal is not just for Steem to be a social media platform, but for it to be a thriving economy in its own right.
The plan for bootstrapping the economic system is simple, keeping in mind the chicken and egg scenario where currencies need users for merchants to consider them and users need practical use cases (e.g. merchants) for them to even consider acquiring the currency:
- Make an attractive platform for users that also distributes to users in a controlled manner.
- Encourage development of services that make use of the currency.
We have (1) in some basic form already, but still the number of active users is lacking. (2) has some rough pockets but they exist and seem to be developing.
The system should practically feed itself once we really get going. So what's missing? How do we get to the next level?
Well, for starters I already believe the platform is headed the right direction in terms of what we can develop. It's exciting to see many different applications built on top, to increase the diversity of ways we interact with each other.
I see much of the ongoing work by Steemit as reducing various frictions. HF20 is focused on account creation and usability with respect to running certain operations. SMT will allow these applications to control the behavior of custom tokens to grow in a more independent way. Oracles will be a nice feature to further tune a token's customizability.
Commerce and the SBD
I know at least some people are thinking about the commerce side. But I think the beauty of the current ordering of priorities is that bootstrapping doesn't actually need a fully functioning commerce to bring people in. And bringing people in will inevitably encourage commercial operators to build something to integrate with the platform, regardless of whether we have a functional peg or not. That being said, the peg needs to be functional, being a significant point of friction for merchants spooked by the unreliability of SBD's value. At the moment if one is a merchant, one has to settle with immediately converting to FIAT (unless of course the local Fiat is worse off) in the face of market volatility.
This next part is highly speculative, but I believe the peg will get there on its own assuming that the market cap of Steem gets to the next level. People cite low liquidity as ripe for manipulation, but in theory this should get harder as the steem market cap rises, with SBD supply rising in lock step.
Initiatives Under Our Control
About what we can also do right now... Well, I would call myself a small investor, looking for the long term. If you want some piece of good news, it's that I have invested a non trivial amount of funds into this platform, and have seen similar movements by others in this current bear market. I am on the more active side of investing as well, choosing to engage directly and spreading my stake as much as I can. I have a few auto voters on community accounts and trails, but I see that as a form of delegation in rewarding a broader set of people. I actively look for and delegate to users that take the time to engage with many others in the community, as this real engagement is how we help with retention.
We (myself included) like to shame the shortsighted whales, but as has been pointed out to me several times, it is fairly unproductive, and flagging helps a little but ultimately it just makes them dig deeper. The focus instead will be about how to get a higher percentage of stake engaged in the kind of behavior that will help user retention and really just focus on the long term. Maybe these whales will take a break from their behavior to help once in a while, who knows.
And that's why I want to give a shout out to everyone who has created contests, developers that have enabled other interactions (e.g. dlive, dtube, dsound, steemhunt, and musing, and community leaders that foster engagement within. MSP radio, steem monsters... #dogsofsteemit .... Open mic, comedy open mic... @curie and @ocd .... The engagement and curation league run by @paulag and @abh12345 .... @welcomewagon ... I'm sure I'm leaving out so many things... There's so much to be excited about!
I guess I don't really have anything to offer myself, I'm just watching things bloom in the limited free time that I have. But I'm happy to throw my support for engagement.
Bid Bots and Promotion
I'll tell you something right now though: bid bots aren't helping with this. As much as you hear the same old promotion Kool aid, do these things really help with keeping people engaged? It's all just a stake extension complicated coin shuffler that heavily favors the delegators and bot operators, but it doesn't actually help with engagement. It gives access to trending, maybe it diversifies who is there a little for people with money, but ultimately it's just a side show, and I would appreciate if more and more people recognize it as such. Basically, while this provides some amount value exchange, it's not providing a long term value to the platform. But whatever, it's like the short-sighted investor... Increase the amount of stake that isn't coming from this activity.
I should mention also that there are lesser evils here too, some that at least do curation efforts, or allocation of funds raised from this activity to support engaging efforts, so those are nice, taking some of the pure rewards that would go to delegators and finding a better use of it.
So, What Needs to Happen, Again?
I don't have the answers, and I'm sure there are some disagreements with the positions of my post, but this is how I look at the playground (hmm I meant platform but I like this word here) today. I do have some random suggestions for things that could help move things along.
- Hobby based communities... Better discovery for tags. Get more people to find and curate a hobby you are passionate about, become a tag leader, and secure some amount of support as the participants grow.
- Like minded delegators seeking to find new communities that pop up should have a good place to discover these efforts.
But what about jumping to the next order of magnitude of users?
I'm reminded of the tipping point which analyzes trends, and how they behave like viruses. If we approach from this angle, where it seems that you just need a small number of influencers that can create a viral movement, we may just need to identify those people and win them over. I suppose a significant barrier to this is that such people likely are already getting paid by the existing system. The "influencer". How do we turn them? Also... Are we ready for such a large influx of people?
Turning them may simply be a matter of identifying which high visibility influencers are interested in cryptocurrencies. Given the current excitement, this shouldn't be so hard? And if I'm not mistaken, there are such people that have come and gone, which is quite a disappointment. Part of that comes from coming into a hostile environment as we've seen with the recent example of that person who went to minds instead. But just as well, we don't want them to just come in and be idle-- they need to be willing to build a community, to engage with the wider community.
I'll have to think about this a bit more, but maybe we can brainstorm an "influencer kit" that both the platform and said influencer could mutually benefit from. Any ideas?
But back to the second question.. if there were a sudden mass influx of people, could we organize them into functional units? I'm not sure I know the answer to that. The best we can do is provide as high of a diversity of ways to engage I suppose. But maybe it's not even necessary-- after all, they already do much of the same things on a platform that doesn't pay them at all. Still... It's a barrier to jump, and there needs to be some catalyst for that. Some food for thought.
Anyway, this is my ramble about Steem for the time being. Let me know what you think, if you did read through :)
Great post with a realistic POV. The Steem blockchain itself is growing so fast in terms of development. Now it needs an influx of new users.
Check out our new @steembluepages directory for a rundown on what's what and who's who on the blockchain right now. We're hoping the @steembluepages project can help current and new users gain an easier grasp of everything's that's out there in the ecosystem. Cheers!
Oooh there's some things in there I haven't even heard of. I'll definitely take a look and suggest if I see anything missing.
I've been thinking about bid bots and wrote my own post (not up yet) about why they're going to recede in popularity.
Basically, better options keep popping up. They had been the only show in town to make passive Steem.
More app development is lowering friction and we're soon going to see millions more join as HF 20 and SMTs foster huge growth for the platform.
Hustle and sweat now; Steem is only in the bottom of the first inning.
Posted using Partiko Android
Absolutely! Will look forward to those thoughts. It's funny because I see two schools of thought: (1) don't chase passive steem because it does so to the detriment of platform potential that would boost your steem value long term, and (2) there are way better ways to get ROI (sometimes measured in intangible social value) than the current passive earners.
Actually I forgot the third school of thought that passive steem earners are important to attracting investors but this is not something I agree with.
I'm in the first camp but either way the common ground is to convince people that there are better ways the stakeholders of the platform can use their stake to make steem an attractive platform for everyone.
Number 1 is dead on, and a big reason why I'm not going to argue too much about the third school of thought. I've even begun to reduce my bid bot delegation to put my Steem where my mouth is.
I kinda got caught up in thinking about the influencers part. Can you imagine if we got Tom Ferriss here? He would break Steemit in a heartbeat - there would be no way to handle the load (i think - I’m not really privy to how many people we could onboard a day after HF20).
There is a thing called the Tim Ferriss effect where he mentions a product in a blog or on a podcast and it’s sold out and back ordered within hours. Oh! And do I mention I’m a huge fan?
Kevin Rose would be another I could think of who could create a lot of ripples here.
But how to entice them?? That’s the question you raised and a great one at that. I’ll be looking forward to some of the more creative people on the playground chiming in.
As always, an interesting and thought provoking post - I’ll be following.
~T
The most fantastic thing about this post is you have basically written exactly what is rattling around in my own head - only I would never have been able to convert it to text in such an eloquent way.
I am constantly told, and do believe it is true that more investors need bringing in to push the platform forward. But I feel that what will achieve that is development of communities and the real active people on this platform showing what it is capable of - as a social network a hub for communities and a true way for people from around the world to interact with each other and share knowledge and interests.
My own input is interaction, trying to encourage and retain people by sharing their work and and giving it appreciation through comments. There are so many communities growing and expanding now and I'm very interested to see what Hivemind will bring as well - certainly I think we have a lot to look forward to.
#thealliance #witness
Thank you for kind feedback! I think it's great that we have multiple people chasing different paths for spreading the good word about Steem, so I'm definitely excited about what's to come. Hivemind is going to be fun to experiment too, I expect this to enable a whole new class of front ends (and steemit.com is included in being able to add in so many different features). Excited!
I don't even know how many of the first million are actually people instead of alts and bots.
I would be happy with the next 50k active users being actually humans.
Yeah tens of thousands is right about the order of magnitude of active users. Maybe I should have said the 'first million users' :)
Posted using Partiko Android