You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: It might be crypto vs. corporate - That was a terrible way to resign.
As someone who knows neither Ned or Dan personally but who has observed a lot of the behaviours exhibited through posts and employment of leverage, there was not a 'right' way for Dan to do this. Had he been more clear as to his reasons, he would have been accused of something by one interest group or another. It seems that slipping out the back door and leaving Ned in the chair was probably the best option every which way round.
I personally have had a disagreement with management been asked to resign and stood in front of my team of 46 direct reports who also had teams and gave a speech on the exit plan and how it was going to go. That is a part of leaving a company. I can't believe people accept such bad behavior around here like it is normal.
Why? Because I hired those people away from other opportunities, I worked with them daily and I cared about their success and I felt a responsibility to them. I didn't even have investors. SMH.
I hear you @whatsup, I have been through various episodes in life which just stink. There is not a lot of information and so we are really just guessing. I believe that the best thing to do now is allow Ned (with or without Dan's commentary) to do the right thing by everyone.
Feeling angry, upset, betrayed, bewildered etc are emotions which are understandable.
The expression of those in the midst of not knowing the full situation will not help the situation. It may make things worse.
I feel I sound a bit like a preacher. I do not mean to be. Just have been in even worse situations. The CEO has a job on his hands - the past few weeks can hardly have been a picnic with all the goings-on - albeit self-inflicted.