You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Hey Steemit Inc and Witnesses, Please limit the Follow to 2 People/day!
Im a human and I can only spent sundays on steemit. I read number of posts a day and im looking for interesting authors to follow. Your limitation would target people like me. Bots would be fine.
I hate limits. I believe in freewill. I do not want limits in anything. If it costs money to follow, then Steemit can tell us how much money we have to pay to follow. It either costs money or it does not. And if it does not cost money or bandwidth, then don't limit it. And if it is expensive for the bandwidth, or whatever, then make people pay to play. Steemit should be logical in their rules. I believe in the rule of free market. Let money be the only rule.
Thank you for your valuable comment.
I appreciate your time and effort. I hope you will do well on steemit :)
I will do my best to support you and upvote your content from time to time
ps. did you manage to recover your twitter/facebook account?
yours
Piotr
No, my YouTube was permanently closed by YouTube. So, I lost thousands of videos in 2017. Twitter said I was a Russian bot and I have to confirm my Twitter with a phone I lost with a number I had in Vietnam. I'm near Seattle now and cannot get the number and I cannot change the number for Twitter. Facebook has terminated some of my groups, pages, and accounts, many times, for many years now.
Money isn't an issue @joeynoldvn, they will continue to put more money in buying network resources that's never an issue. My true intention is follow to follow is wasted transaction unnecessarily wasting network resources which could have been used for wider good and introducing SMTs. Well, it was just a random idea and won't be executed because community won't agree even if follow is just a wasted number on the platform.
People waste things with money and resources and that is what life is all about, making choices, in how we spend resources, money, time, and everything, and I encourage the exercises of those choices regardless of whether or not they are wasteful or not because it is better to waste and to live than to not waste and never live.
Yeah thats true, 2 is to few, maybe it can work like with voting power, so there is a certain limit but it's elastic.