You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A case for eliminating curation rewards

in #steem9 years ago

Because there is no standard to tell what 'well' is , 'well' is subjective, some people might think well is this and other may think well is another thing, there is no way to define 'well'.

This is why we have voting. We're trying to define "well" by "quantity of people/SP upvoted minus downvoted". If you disagree with this definition, then we have no base to discuss.

I don't want to change it, i want to eliminate it :)

It's still a change.

By the way I just found that you replied to my post earlier, so it's my fault to link it here for several times, sorry.

Sort:  

This is why we have voting. We're trying to define "well" by "quantity of people/SP upvoted minus downvoted". If you disagree with this definition, then we have no base to discuss.

This is the problem 'well' in the platform is currently defined by being 'content that pay the most.' not ' content that people like the most'

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.09
TRX 0.32
JST 0.033
BTC 107182.38
ETH 3751.51
USDT 1.00
SBD 0.60