1000 Scientists Declare Man Made Global Warming Climate Change a Complete Fraud / HoaxsteemCreated with Sketch.

in #science6 years ago (edited)

“I am a skeptic...Global warming has become a new religion.”

Nobel Prize Winner for Physics, Ivar Giaever.

“Since I am no longer affiliated with any organization nor receiving any funding, I can speak quite frankly....As a scientist I remain skeptical...The main basis of the claim that man’s release of greenhouse gases is the cause of the warming is based almost entirely upon climate models. We all know the frai
lty of models concerning the air-surface system.”

Atmospheric Scientist Dr. Joanne Simpson, the first woman in the world to receive a PhD in meteorology, and formerly of NASA, who has authored more than 190 studies and has been called “among the most preeminent scientists of the last 100 years.”

Warming fears are the “worst scientific scandal in the history...When people come to know what the truth is, they will feel deceived by science and scientists.”

UN IPCC Japanese Scientist Dr. Kiminori Itoh, an award-winning PhD environmental physical chemist.

“So far, real measurements give no ground for concern about a catastrophic future warming.”

Scientist Dr. Jarl R. Ahlbeck, a chemical engineer at Abo Akademi
University in Finland, author of 200 scientific publications and former Greenpeace member.

“Anyone who claims that the debate is over and the conclusions are firm has a fundamentally unscientific approach to one of the most momentous issues of our time.”

Solar physicist Dr. Pal Brekke, senior advisor to the Norwegian Space Centre in Oslo. Brekke has published more than 40 peer-reviewed scientific articles on the sun and solar interaction with the Earth.

“The models and forecasts of the UN IPCC are incorrect because they only are based on mathematical models and presented results at scenarios that do not include, for example, solar activity.”

Victor Manuel Velasco Herrera, a researcher at the Institute of Geophysics of the National Autonomous University of Mexico

“It is a blatant lie put forth in the media that makes it seem there is only a fringe of scientists who don’t buy into anthropogenic global warming.”

U.S Government Atmospheric Scientist Stanley B. Goldenberg of the Hurricane Research Division of NOAA.

“Even doubling or tripling the amount of carbon dioxide will virtually have little impact, as water vapour and water condensed on particles as clouds dominate the worldwide scene and always will.”

Geoffrey G. Duffy, a professor in the Department of Chemical and Materials Engineering of the University of Auckland, NZ.

“After reading [UN IPCC chairman] Pachauri's asinine comment [comparing skeptics to] Flat Earthers, it's hard to remain quiet.”

Climate statistician Dr. William M. Briggs, who specializes in the statistics of forecast evaluation, serves on the American Meteorological Society's Probability and Statistics Committee and is an Associate Editor of Monthly Weather Review.

“The Kyoto theorists have put the cart before the horse. It is global warming that triggers higher levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, not the other way round...A large number of critical documents submitted at the 1995 U.N. conference in Madrid vanished without a trace. As a result, the discussion was one-sided and heavily biased, and the U.N. declared global warming to be a scientific fact,”

Andrei Kapitsa, a Russian geographer and Antarctic ice core researcher.

“I am convinced that the current alarm over carbon dioxide is mistaken...Fears about man-made global warming are unwarranted and are not based on good science.”

Award Winning Physicist Dr. Will Happer, Professor at the Department of Physics at Princeton University and Former Director of Energy Research at the Department of Energy, who has published over 200 scientific papers, and is a fellow of the American Physical Society, The American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the National Academy of Sciences.

“Nature's regulatory instrument is water vapor: more carbon dioxide leads to less moisture in the air, keeping the overall GHG content in accord with the necessary balance conditions.”

Prominent Hungarian Physicist and environmental researcher Dr. Miklós Zágoni reversed his view of man-made warming and is now a skeptic. Zágoni was once Hungary’s most outspoken supporter of the Kyoto Protocol.

“For how many years must the planet cool before we begin to understand that the planet is not warming? For how many years must cooling go on?"

Geologist Dr. David Gee the chairman of the science committee of the 2008 International Geological Congress who has authored 130 plus peer reviewed papers, and is currently at Uppsala University in Sweden

“Gore prompted me to start delving into the science again and I quickly found myself solidly in the skeptic camp...Climate models can at best be useful for explaining climate changes after the fact.”

Meteorologist Hajo Smit of Holland, who reversed his belief in man-made warming to become a skeptic, is a former member of the Dutch UN IPCC committee.

“The quantity of CO2 we produce is insignificant in terms of the natural circulation between air, water and soil... I am doing a detailed assessment of the UN IPCC reports and the Summaries for Policy Makers, identifying the way in which the Summaries have distorted the science.”

South Afican Nuclear Physicist and Chemical Engineer Dr. Philip Lloyd, a UN IPCC co-coordinating lead author
who has authored over 150 refereed publications.

“Many [scientists] are now searching for a way to back out quietly (from promoting warming fears), without having their professional careers ruined.”

Atmospheric physicist James A. Peden, formerly of the Space Research and Coordination Center in Pittsburgh.

“All those urging action to curb global warming need to take off the blinkers and give some thought to what we should do if we are facing global cooling instead.”

Geophysicist Dr. Phil Chapman, an astronautical engineer and former NASA astronaut, served as staff physicist at MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)

“Creating an ideology pegged to carbon dioxide is a dangerous nonsense...The present alarm on climate change is an instrument of social control, a pretext for major businesses and political battle. It became an ideology, which is concerning.”

Environmental Scientist Professor Delgado Domingos of Portugal, the founder of the Numerical Weather Forecast group, has more than 150 published articles.

“CO2 emissions make absolutely no difference one way or another....Every scientist knows this, but it doesn’t pay to say so...Global warming, as a political vehicle, keeps Europeans in the driver’s seat and developing nations walking barefoot.”

Dr. Takeda Kunihiko, vice-chancellor of the Institute of Science and Technology Research at Chubu University in Japan.

“The [global warming] scaremongering has its justification in the fact that it is something that generates funds.”

Award-winning Paleontologist Dr. Eduardo Tonni, of the Committee for Scientific Research in Buenos Aires and head of the Paleontology Department at the University of La Plata.

“Whatever the weather, it's not being caused by global warming. If anything, the climate may be starting into a cooling period.”

Atmospheric scientist Dr. Art V. Douglas, former Chair of the Atmospheric Sciences Department at Creighton University in Omaha, Nebraska, and is the author of numerous papers for peer-reviewed publications.

“But there is no falsifiable scientific basis whatever to assert this warming is caused by human-produced greenhouse gasses because current physical theory is too grossly inadequate to establish any cause at all.”

Chemist Dr. Patrick Frank, who has authored more than 50 peer-reviewed articles.

“The ‘global warming scare’ is being used as a political tool to increase government control over American lives, incomes and decision making. It has no place in the Society's activities.”

Award-Winning NASA Astronaut/Geologist and Moonwalker Jack Schmitt who flew on the Apollo 17 mission and formerly of the Norwegian Geological Survey and for the U.S. Geological Survey.

“Earth has cooled since 1998 in defiance of the predictions by the UN-IPCC....The global temperature for 2007 was the coldest in a decade and the coldest of the millennium...which is why ‘global warming’ is now called ‘climate change.’”

Climatologist Dr. Richard Keen of the Department of Atmospheric and
Oceanic Sciences at the University of Colorado.

“I have yet to see credible proof of carbon dioxide driving climate change, yet alone man-made CO2 driving it. The atmospheric hot-spot is missing and the ice core data refute this. When will we collectively awake from this deceptive delusion?”
Dr. G LeBlanc Smith, a retired Principal Research Scientist with Australia’s CSIRO.



It is duty and obligation of all to minimize the release of harmful gases which harm the green green house.

Wait, Grand Solar Minimum and geoMagnetic Reversal are going to bring population down by hmmm 90% eventually,, only the cream of intellectual agility will make it through.. oh and of course,, the ''1%'',,, we'll take care of them later.

Quite obvious by now this is a scam.

i just found this post, this is pure gold ! i am now a follower of yours.

"Multiple studies published in peer-reviewed scientific journals show that 97 percent or more of actively publishing climate scientists agree: Climate-warming trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. In addition, most of the leading scientific organizations worldwide have issued public statements endorsing this position."
Source: NASA (https://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/)

97%!!! You found the remaining 3%, congrats..

97%? I checked your reference and found no statistical evidence indicating a majority of the sample is falling for the global warming hoax. Your analysis wouldn't even pass a high school research project.

When you don't have any arguments, just play dumb: "The consensus that humans are causing recent global warming is shared by 90%–100% of publishing climate scientists according to six independent studies by co-authors of this paper. Those results are consistent with the 97% consensus reported by Cook et al (Environ. Res. Lett. 8 024024) based on 11 944 abstracts of research papers, of which 4014 took a position on the cause of recent global warming."

Source: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/11/4/048002

Science is factual, a consensus is a bunch of people that agree they like having power and grant money.
Tell me this. What is the "correct" temperature of the earth?

Consensus isn't science, and the 97% claim is bogus.

What were the factors for Climate Variability in all Earths' history? Now find any text on Global Warming or Climate Change and use the "find" tool to look for keywords like "Solar Cycles", "Grand Solar Minimums/Maximums", geoMagnetic Reversals", "cosmic/galactic radiations", "cloud coverage", "cloud nucleation", "volcanism'', ''Milankowitch Cycles'', "etc".. you will find nothing.. now how can "97% of climatologists and scientists determine that Human Activity, namely CO2, is the main cause of Global Warming (lately replaced with Climate Change)",, while completely ignoring all other factors?? What kind of "science" is that? Furthermore, find any computer model for Climate Change and see if you find those parameters above.. nothing.. how can these models "predict" the climate without those parameters (that completely dwarf CO2 by the way)? How can policy be made based on such flawed "models"?? Oh and you know what? In all those computer models, the "Solar Radiation" parameter is a Constant,, not a Variable.. again, what kind of "science" is that? Political science?55c0eacf-920c-44d3-af5a-cda142ed7aa3.jpg

This is well documented. I have been on to this scam for about ten years now. It is unreal how anti-American this movement is. #GIA. Al Gore is one of the biggest con men peddling this drivel as well. Thanks for sharing.

Everyone on Steemit should read and upvote. Climate change and fiat currency will be the biggest disappointments to the masses in human history.

Absolutely! Thanks for your comment. I don't expect many upvotes on this. But just the fact that people see this headline scrolling down the screen is enough for me. At least some of us are ahead of the curve and getting out of the global warming religion and fiat currency pyramid scheme while we still can.

ive never seen a scam like global warming be so throughly proven false yet continue to persist.

Just visit 5 different ecosystems (and get out of your comfort zone) and look at the degradation of the natural ecosystem including extinction of some species have occurred, not to mention deforestation and acidification of oceans and bleaching of reefs...looks like some ppl do like stay under the rock forever. When you talk about climate change its not just about "% of temperature rise".

thunderstrike, ''Acidification of oceans and bleaching of reefs'' etc etc is nothing but more propaganda from the extreme green/eco-fascists. Only the true believers of this AGW cult believe anything the likes of so-called conservation bodies such as the WWF, Wilderness Society, CAFNEC, the National Coral Bleaching Taskforce and the Conservation Foundation preach. The healthy Great Barrier Reef deniers have been caught time and time again lying about coral bleaching and condition of the barrier reef. The AGW Cult gets strength through knowing that no matter what happens, their faith will not be shaken. They refuse to acknowledge the failed past global warming predictions, instead like all end-of-the-world religious cults they just change the dates.

Anyone who dares question their so called science is censured and eventually terminated. Prof Peter Ridd at James Cook University is the latest victim of this cult, unlike many before him he's taking up the fight in the courts. JCU Professor Peter Ridd exposed a paper by JCU extreme green scientists foretelling the end of the reef was simply ‘laughable’. ''Bleaching is a natural event, and occurred long before there was human activity anywhere near the reef. What is more, reefs recover, sometimes quite quickly. The University is competing for research funds thus it has to create a doomsday scenario''.

“We can no longer trust the scientific organisations like the Australian Institute of marine Science, even things like the ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies… The science is coming out not properly checked, tested or replicated, and this is a great shame.”

thunderstrike ''get out of your comfort zone'' you have been conned and your cult is falling apart.

Don't be silly, Leonardo Di Caprio knows better than all these "scientists"! :-/

Al Gore does too. After all he did invent the Internet.

Here's the definitive response to your denigrating Gore's role in establishing the commercial internet, written by Vince Cerf and Bob Kahn, the guys who invented the internet:


What nonsense article and post, do any of these so-called naysayers understand the term "climate change"? It means any and all direct or indirect human activities that cause disruption in the natural ecosystem and/or climate of the planet.
1.Surely we are responsible for some of the species extinction,
2.Surely we are responsible polluting the air and water,
3.Surely we are responsible for creating the hole in ozone layer,
4.Surely we are responsible for acidification of the oceans,
5.Surely we responsible for massive soil degradation,
6.Surely we are responsible for massive deforestation,
7.Surely we are responsible for introducing so many chemicals and carcinogens in the ecosystem,
8.Surely we are responsible for plundering the natural resources through our bad living habits without blinking an eye for sustainability concerns,
9.Surely we are responsible for extracting and burning fossil fuels which have a devastating impact...
now I have not even touched the "temperature" point yet...get some real facts and education all you deniers...future generation will only mock and show anger towards you bunch.

Good article. People need to stop and think about why many scientists disagree or have doubts about global warming. Science is NEVER settled!

We will fight climate change!
Climate justice now!

But here's the thing: Warming do the greenhouse effect caused by human-generated CO2 concentrations has been predicted since the 50s, and since the 80s we are seeing an obvious warming trend, manifested most clearly in the melting of glaciers. Even if correlation is not causation, it would be an uncanny coincidence that at nearly the instant we predicted the Earth would warm due to increased human-sourced greenhouse gas concentrations, that a natural warming cycle would start. There is no valid argument that the Earth is not warming, and the far, far most probable cause is the scientific consensus of human activity.

It is a strange American phenomenon that a political machine is putting out disinformation to treat human-caused climate change as anything other than sound science in order to protect the fossil fuel industry, and by extension, in their estimate, the American economy. It is unfortunate, as the renewable energy and electric vehicle industries are poised to explode and the US could find itself taking a back seat to China.

studies show that this article is a hoax

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.08
JST 0.024
BTC 26833.15
ETH 1873.84
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.27