CAN A PAIR OF BOOBIES ACTUALLY REACH THE SPEED OF LIGHT
Something is really bothering me
There is a question that I cannot get my head around. I am not expecting this post to become explosive, but I am hoping that a of my followers and new people out there can shed some light on thing in my head I cannot get around.....
Einstein's Theory of Relativity
When 'E" which is energy (Measured in Joules) is applied to an object say a spaceship or a pair of big boobies like the post title implied.... This energy is equal to the 'm' mass of the object multiplied by the speed of light times itself....... 'c' squared....
Now let's just say that if a pair of BOOBIES was floating out in space and linear kinetic energy was applied to it... the boobies would start accelerating one direction.... And if the energy is constantly applied, or increasingly applied... the boobies will go faster.... So every second that goes by the boobies will be going faster and faster..... Sooner or later the boobies will reach the speed of light as long as the source of energy does not stop right?
WRONG
Because it is a mathematical equation and 'E' and 'm' are on opposite sides of the '=' sign...... the more energy applied... the higher the mass.............. So If energy is increased ... the boobies gain more mass.....
And if they increase in mass.... then more energy will be required again.... and light speed can never be reached....
Now my question is....................
Can we say that................. A terminal velocity will be reached? Not due to air resistance..... But my an ENERGY/ MASS equilibrium?
Or can we way that the need for energy required for BOOBIES to reach light speed is going be exponentially more demanding in space flight on a physical object?
I have been pondering that all morning... not the boobies... NOT THIS TIME ;) ANYWAY.... But if a physical object trying to reach lightspeed in space like a rocket ship with nuclear sources for energy so it can last a long time.
Is there anyone out there who can enter a discussion about this with me? The BOOBIES or the PHYSICS.....
I'd love to hear from you...
Regards
Yoda
Honestly I don't even know if you are serious but anyways, if you heat up a steel ball or a boobie whichever you prefer in your living room, do you increase its mass?????. A lot candle heats up the surrounding air. Does it increase the mass of air?
The energy applied to boobies in space will not increase Boobies mass
ROFLMAO.
Well the answer is no I think.... Energy applied to matter increases the vibrations (kinetic theory). And there will be a little more space between the particles... So first the boobies will get a little bigger. And if more heat was applied... then the the rate at which heat radiates away will be equal to the heat put in... SO it would not get any hotter.
In a steel ball that would work .............. but boobies would burn............
Hey can you please please resteem this for me so I can have more discussions like this?
I did resteem . I can't fucking believe I'm answering questions about boobies after midnight
Well you did................ hahahaha
Actually, at near light speeds, mass increases as does density, inversely proportionate to its volume. So he's right... even though he's having a laugh. Einstein is still correct.
Yes he is
But the mass does not increase because of energy applied to boobies
Not energy alone. But his original contention, I think, in all his rambling, was that as the boobies approach light speed they would follow Einstein's equations.
Now I am a physics major and a medical doctor. I am sure you have great qualifications. I find it interesting that we are talking about boobies in space reaching the speed of light ( exact value still not known) and theory of relativity. A theory that may or may not hold true at that speed.
Agreed, it's a ridiculous discussion, with no scientific significance. Just fun to say boobies and Einstein in the same sentence.
Lmao
So flying through space at increasing velocity can make saggy BOOBIES a little more firm?
Congratulations! This post has been upvoted from the communal account, @minnowsupport, by yoda1917 from the Minnow Support Project. It's a witness project run by aggroed, ausbitbank, teamsteem, theprophet0, and someguy123. The goal is to help Steemit grow by supporting Minnows and creating a social network. Please find us in the Peace, Abundance, and Liberty Network (PALnet) Discord Channel. It's a completely public and open space to all members of the Steemit community who voluntarily choose to be there.
If you like what we're doing please upvote this comment so we can continue to build the community account that's supporting all members.
"Yoda"... ROFLMAO. The rest of the post was funny, but that took the cake.
Hahahaha Well I was serious about the physics too..... Hey can you please resteem that for me so others can have a laugh..... And do I qualify for a follow and an upvote? ;)
I will follow you two smart assess and upvote and resteem. You crazy nuts and boobies
BOOBIES......................................
I certainly appreciate your persistence on this subject of science
And..................BOOBIES................
weight does not equal mass!
No it does not and a big pair of boobies will be weightless in space. But they can still pack a punch...
Think I have earned an upvote and a follow?
Please resteem this for me. I am loving this conversation lol
Nice.....
Can you please resteem this post for me? That would be much appreciated :)
Einstein was wrong and that famous equation is wrong E & C are both representations of energy so you cannot have an imbalanced equation with energy represented on both sides of =. The only reason it is not debunked is on the basis of field equations. Of course that is not the full equation which is E= (mc^2)^2 + p^2
Here is what I hear you are saying.... There should only be energy on one side of the = and the effect of energy on the other side. And if C is an form of energy then it would not work as there is energy on both sides of the equation which causes imbalance. But I not familiar how C is an energy. unless you are saying that Velocity (kinetic energy) is a form of energy since distance over time on the other side is the effect.... Sit... I may have just answered my own question...lol.
In this context though.... would the boobies inflate? explode? or stay the same size but become firmer and firmer as they are increasing in density? ... lol
@nedspeaks might have a valid opinion about this
Part of Einsteinium is that there is only one energy. Light, heat, motion are all one energy that we are observing from different perspectives. Basing an opinion more on the works of Steinmetz and Heavyside, the answer is that the boobs would get hotter and hotter until they burst into flames and became a plasma gas, a total waste of perfectly good boobage
Hahahahaha.... upvoted that awesome answer. No good for a good set of boobs to go to waste
Hey can you resteem this for me so maybe the minority of like minds out there can come and join in this crazy conversation?
I resteemed your other crazy real life rant
Thanks... which one was that?
The one you went over your life story, maybe it was heavily revisionist or overly dramatic but it was none the less the best read of the day, therefore resteemable
Appreciate that. And it was a dramatic time
Appreciate it, it was a gift. If bad never happened we would never no what 'good' is.
I believe in that :)
@yoda1917 science is my favorite! And for this matter I remember since when im in 3rd year high school!
It was ENERGY a power capacity to the work. 😊😊😊