Did Science Fiction Influence You?

in #science7 years ago (edited)

Sigma Xi is an honorary society for scientists and engineers, founded in 1886 at Cornell.

Friendship in Science. While those whose heart and soul is in their work, are coping with the great problems of Nature, let them remember that the ties of friendship cannot be investigated, but only felt. Let them join heart and hand, forming a brotherhood in Science and Engineering; thus promoting and encouraging by those strong, personal attachments of friendship, the highest and the truest advances in the scientific field. To lend aid and encouragement to those newer brothers, who likewise, laboring in the same sphere are aspiring to honored positions. And in collegiate halls to award an honor, which to scientific recipients shall signify, "Come up higher!"
Therefore, with these ends and objects, the signers of this paper, do hereby agree to lend their efforts to the establishment of an organization to be publicly known as the Society of the Sigma Xi.
From the first Sigma Xi Constitution (1886)

They're now headquartered in Research Triangle Park, about an hour away from Greensboro here in NC.  I can only presume they've updated their constitution to remove all the sexism.

"Did Science Fiction Influence You?"

In 2010, Sigma Xi took on an unusual informal research project.  They asked their 60,000 members to reflect on their experiences with science fiction, in their lives and in their careers.  They selected their favorite answers and turned them into this white paper.  Totally anecdotal, with no criteria for inclusion or anything that would justify this as actual science.  Still, it's kind of interesting.  Most of these are clearly old white dudes who read the Big Three -- Heinlein, Asimov, and Clarke -- but there are also fans of science fiction TV and movies.  

As always, there are debates as what counts as SF.

"I still enjoy the occasional Sci-Fi novel or short story, but am particular in my definition of real science fiction. It should violate no known laws of nature and should anticipate only technologies that would not do so. Obviously, I am not much impressed by deep space travel adventures. No Trecky, I. But if I call it fantasy, I am very willing to suspend disbelief and enjoy a fun tale, such as Diana Gabaldon’s Outlander time travel series."

Those same debates continue now, through the hacking of the Hugo Awards, and I have to wonder if the broadening of the demographics of SF characters bodes well for the broadening of the demographics of STEM professions.  There's no data on that.

Given the age of most of the respondents, it shouldn't be surprising how little mention they make of conventions and SF fandom in general.  That community has really exploded in the past thirty years or so.

My story

Personally, I watched a lot of SF on network television (no cable, and no movies).  However, I read very little of it until college.  As a kid I was more a fan of superhero comics like @readingdanvers.  The characters had a lot more personality than the average highly competent and highly stable astronaut or test pilot.  Tony Stark was an alcoholic, etc.  Given the ideas percolating through them, and the imaginary advanced technology, I would call comics SF, but a lot of other people would not, because they also contained magic and gods and pretty much everything else that wasn't censored at the time.

During college, my association with a gaming group called the Miskatonic Student Union broadened my horizons.  Having several used bookstores around town made a big difference, too.  I gave up my ambitions to be a comic book artist and took classes in science and writing.  If I had known during the late 1980s that scientific & medical illustration was a real and viable option, I might have made different choices.

 [image link]

Once I got to grad school, studying neuroscience in a Ph.D. program at a medical school, comics had become too expensive, and I had no time for novels (too many journal articles to read), so I got into reading short stories, which led to audio fiction podcasts like Escape Pod.  Research was essentially nothing like how it was depicted in 1970s SF -- much slower, more repetitive, and failure-prone, though prose stories have become much more realistic in that way -- and I got into teaching, where I could actually use SF to help reach my students.

Nowadays I do a lot of science outreach to the public.  For instance, I write a column for SF writers for the Intergalactic Medicine Show, to help them improve the science in their stories.  Because of that column, I occasionally do a science panel or two at a fan convention.  I also help organize a local science discussion group, an associated book club, and hopefully soon a YouTube / local cable access TV show.

How 'bout YOU, Steemians?

While most of us are not members of Sigma Xi, I thought it would be fun to repeat their survey here.  There's still the self-selection bias inherent in any Internet research (people who don't care won't answer), but I'm not really worried about experimental validity at this point.  Maybe later if there's enough interest.  For now, same question:

How did science fiction influence you in your choice of career and projects?  If at all ...

Reply in the comments below, as a human.  Voting bots are great and profitable and all that, but this is an exercise in focused personal storytelling.

Thanks for reading!

 

Sort:  

Science fiction has had a huge influence on my life. As a child I was dead set on being a scientist and this was mainly due to science fiction. For much of my youth I wanted to be a paleontologist so naturally films like Jurassic Park appealed to me. I also marveled at the series "Walking With Dinosaurs" which I've just now realized is technically science fiction. I also fondly remember my father reading me Isaac Asimov's "Robot Dreams" when I was still young enough to be read to.

It barely counts as science fiction but I very much emulated Dexter from Dexter's Laboratory and the character Jason Fox from the Foxtrot comics. In addition I loved Star Trek. As a middle schooler Voyager was my favorite, but now I have far more appreciation for Next Generation.

One of my all time favorite series was Stargate SG-1. SG-1 is more space fantasy then science fiction but I feel it's worth mention anyway. In particular the fact that it also had a humanities influence with references to various history and myth and an archeologist as a main cast member is significant to me as I'm now studying archaeology.

In high school my grades weren't looking sufficient for a serious career in science so I chose to pursue my other passion, film. As a film student I took a science fiction class and pitched sci-fi script ideas in screenwriting class. I also talked my experimental film teacher into letting me make this as a final project:

I completely failed to make the models look like anything other then toys but I'm still proud of the sound design as I used audio based on planetary magnetic fields and the "Wow signal".

My first ever paid publication was a science fiction short story called "Mercy Park". The story is based on the idea of the "euthanasia coaster" and follows a person who narrates his ride via a thought-to-text device. When it was accepted into Perihelion the editor wrote "Well, this is certainly one of the most unusual, disturbing stories that I've read in quite some time. I have to publish it." A response I'm still incredibly proud of. My story is not available online right now but there should be a reprint in the future.

As I mentioned I'm now studying archaeology. I enrolled in a Masters Program at Yale last year. This means a lot to me as Yale was my dream school as a child. So I've returned to the serious pursuit of a career in science, albeit a social science in this case. Still I think my ten year old self would be satisfied to know where I am today though perhaps slightly disappointed I'm studying ancient people instead of dinosaurs.

I wholeheartedly reject the definition the quoted person tries to impose on the genre. To insist that science fiction must be completely scientifically accurate is to discount most works in the genre, including some of the most seminal and influential ones. To call a story fantasy simply because some of the science is inaccurate is simply wrong. Fantasy is an entirely different genre with it's own literary tradition.

That is a very thorough answer, easily the equal of anything in the Sigma Xi sample (actually, the addition of the film clip puts it over the top, imho). Thank you.

Those endless debates about what is and is not SF are pretty pointless. To me, science fiction could just as easily be classified as a form of applied philosophy, a continuation of the utopian/satiric traditions of Thomas More and Jonathan Swift. Whatever the technical or magical special effects, many many SF stories contain classic moral dilemmas.

Thank you! To me the deciding element is the presence of scientific story elements, central to the plot which in some way delve into the theoretical. These story elements can include the speculation that certain aspects of our modern understanding of science are wrong or how things might be different if certain known laws did not exist or did not work in the way they're currently understood to work.

As Arthur C Clark once said "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible". So I see no reason to shun works that do just that.

I do love stories which are rooted firmly in what is known to be scientifically possible, such as some of the more grounded episodes of Black Mirror but I see no reason they should be declared the only "true" science fiction.

To me fantasy is defined by a central focus on pre-scientific ideas, in particular some form of magic which has no scientific explanation. Fantasy worlds need not be devoid of science, but science is not a key focus. Just as an example, in the world of Harry Potter we can presume that science exists and the products of scientific research are still vital to the non-magical world, but the books never really delve into this because the focus is on the mythology-inspired concept of magic.

Coincidentally, another quote from Clarke opens my column this month, on a similar theme.

“It seems to me that there is room—one might even say a long unfelt want—
for what might be called the ‘tall’ science-fiction story.
By this I mean stories that are intentionally unbelievable:
not, as is too often the case, unintentionally so.”
– Arthur C. Clarke, preface, Tales from the White Hart

The column should be posted tomorrow at the top of this page
http://www.intergalacticmedicineshow.com/cgi-bin/mag.cgi?do=columns&vol=randall_hayes&article=_index

LitasIO

Well done! This post has received a 7.14 % upvote from @litasio thanks to: @steemstem-bot. Whoop!

If you would like to delegate to the @LitasIO you can do so by clicking on the following link: 10SP

Does science fiction predict the future or does it inspire science to create that future.
Like the original flip phone, based on the communicators from the original star trek

I've really put a thought on this one, but as far as I got it - I had no influence... I'm not a fan of games, I've read very little science-fiction books, watched some films, of course, but not so many and with no obsession...

But you're a STEM professional? You write about psychology, anyway. What did suck you in?

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.19
TRX 0.13
JST 0.029
BTC 57886.34
ETH 3104.72
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.54