You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Can we trust peer-reviewed papers?
Looks interesting. How would one going about proving its existence without the scientific method?
You seem to be following a similar pattern I see in many who love conspiracy theories: change the subject. You bring up Tesla and Mercury and luminiferous aether instead of answering the very clear question that was asked about evolution.
Do you know Kyle personally to know his educational background? If not, you're making unsubstantiated claims right here for all to see. You very well may have more institutional education and you may have found some very important facts about reality the world can benefit from. From my perspective, the way you go about explaining yourself does not inspire critical thinkings to follow down your path.
I made the claim based on statistics. There indeed, is a small chance that I am wrong.
Yes, they are brought up by conspiracy theorist, because there is so much there that has been hidden and obscured.
Its like 9-11 truthers talking about free fall speeds. If you know anything about physics/engineering, then the statement "buildings fell free fall speeds thus explosives were used" is a factual statement. However, those for the "official" story will say, there those crazy conspiracy nuts go again talking about free fall speeds again.
In the same vein, I will bring up Tesla and Mercury because they are very big disproofs of Einstein.
My view on michelson-morley (how modern science doesn't believe in the aether)
https://steemit.com/science/@builderofcastles/the-michelson-morley-experiment-the-error-in-the-errors
My view on the scientific method
https://steemit.com/science/@builderofcastles/the-scientific-method-is-crap-it-is-a-mental-prison-for-scientists