Sort:  

Seen many dehydrated plates in my time, and this was certainly not one of them -- especially after I directly compared it to LB+Cm plates from the same batch that showed negligible rippling where they were beginning to dry out. Check out other photos of Paenibacillus to see what I'm talking about. Those branch points and patterns don't simply arise out of a dry plate; they would be much larger faults and not a separate hue/texture. This is definitely microbial growth on the surface. I can send you the original photos if you would like, but here is a couple enlarged images of the first photo:
[crop large] 20171219_152603_HDR.jpg

Aaannd another. I will draw your attention to the boundary where growth begins to stop. Why would the dehydrated plate not see more of those patterns where the nutrients/agar is minimal? I now turn the skepticism to your interpretation of the data (in true scientific fashion)
[crop small] 20171219_152603_HDR.jpg

Right click and go to "View image" to see the photos in more detail...

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.17
TRX 0.16
JST 0.028
BTC 76338.99
ETH 2965.83
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.62