New Research Indicates A Causal Relationship Between Cannabis Use And SchizophreniasteemCreated with Sketch.

in #science7 years ago (edited)

This post discusses work published January 24th 2017 in the Journal of Molecular Psychiatry titled "Cannabis use and risk of schizophrenia: a Mendelian randomization study."


Preface

Full disclosure, I am a supporter of legal, recreational use of marijuana as well as an increased focus on research into the potential medicinal uses of various canabanoids which can be extracted from this plant. The information contained within this article does not change my personal stances, however it is certainly worth noting.

The Proposed Link Between Marijuana Use and Schizophrenia Is Not New

There have been a wide variety of publications discussing a correlation between the use of marijuana and potential psychotic effects. (2), (3), (4).

These articles have all stressed the fact that correlation is not causation, and that the identification of a causal relationship between schizophrenia and marijuana usage was necessary for making health related recommendations. Were the relationship between cannabis use and schizophrenia causal, cannabis use would represent the most easily modifiable risk factor for development of psychological disorders.

The authors of these previous articles have noted that appropriate steps to account for reverse causation (meaning, those more likely to experience psychological episodes are more inclined to use cannabis rather than the other way around), bias, and other confounding variables were not always appropriately accounted for. As such no previous studies ever indicated a direct causal relationship. (2)


Those publications weren't holding Arnold back

Nevertheless, these publications

have consistently demonstrated that exposure to cannabis is associated with an increased risk of schizophrenia or related disorders.

In addition, there have been biochemical studies showing that certain canabanoids can interfere with various neurotransmission pathways. Interference with these pathways have also been implicated in the development of various psychological disorders, so secondarily there is an indicator that the aforementioned correlation does have a potential biochemical mechanism in the body. (5)



What Did The Authors Do?

In the newly published article, the authors utilized Mandelian randomization in order to explore whether or not there was actually a causal effect between cannabis exposure and elevated risk of schizophrenia.

Mandelian randomization is a way to get unbiased estimates of the effects of a potential causal variable without doing a traditional randomized trial. (7)

To achieve this the authors used 10 most common single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs, pronounced "snips") from a genome wide analysis studying the genetic changes caused by cannabis use, published in 2014 in the Journal of Translational Psychiatry, in order to identify whether or not there was actually a causal link.

Wait what the hell is a SNP?

SNP's are the main source of genetic variation between people, they are the change of a single nucleotide (say a C in one person and an A in a different person). Many of these changes result in no changes to the sequence of proteins (remember that nucleic acids are organized in codons, three base sequence codes, which correspond to the inclusion of a specific amino acid component in a protein, we discussed that [Here] (https://steemit.com/science/@justtryme90/science-lesson-dna-part-3-how-does-the-cell-get-information-out-of-dna) so click if you want a refresher) from the genes in which the SNP is contained (due to the redundancies that are a part of our genetic code). However other times they do result in changes, and these changes can result in people being more or less susceptible to various disease states. Thus testing people for SNP's is becoming an ever expanding part of medical diagnostics (particularly when looking for root causes for cancer). SNP's can even result in changes that make certain drugs less effective in people, while completely effective in someone without the SNP.

Okay So They Used the 10 SNP's That Result From Cannabis Use And...

They compared them with the genes known to be associated with increased risk of schizophrenia found that there was a causal relationship between the genetic changes occurring from use of cannabis and the genes known to be associated with schizophrenia (P=0.007) which they translated into a 37% increase in the risk for developing schizophrenia for users of cannabis vs. non-users. (Before you get scared, the likelihood of developing schizophrenia is about 1%.. so that means for cannabis users the likelihood is about 1.37%).

The authors also tested whether SNP's associated with smoking also were involved in a causal relationship with schizophrenia development (as a control) however no relationship was found.

Limitations To This Study

The authors...

did not control for quantity, type, route of administration or indeed the age at exposure to cannabis.

additionally

the precise mechanisms explaining how some of the genetic markers under analysis alter cannabis use (or dependence) remain unknown.

So additional explanations as to WHY they observed this correlation could not be determined. That said neither of these limitations their determined correlation any less true.

Conclusion

The data reported by this study strongly supports the hypothesis that cannabis usage is causally related to the risk of developing schizophrenia.

My Two Cents

This is nothing to be overly concerned about, as with any aspect of life their is always a positive and negative aspect. Their is no such thing as a free lunch, and there is no action we can perform, food we can eat, chemical we can consume that will not have potential effects on our bodies. What is important is to know about the potential risks associated with our actions and activities and make an informed decision to do what we want (rather than just not knowing).


Sources

  1. http://www.nature.com/mp/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/mp2016252a.html
  2. http://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(15)00647-2/abstract
  3. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11185941
  4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15871146
  5. http://www.biologicalpsychiatryjournal.com/article/S0006-3223(16)00082-2/abstract
  6. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mendelian_randomization
  7. https://academic.oup.com/ije/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/ije/dyg070
  8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4872459/
  9. https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/snp

All Non Cited Images Are From Pixabay.com and Available Under Creative Commons Licenses

Any Gifs Are From Giphy.com and Are Also Available for Use Under Creative Commons Licences



If you like my work, please consider giving me a follow: @justtryme90. I am a PhD holding biochemist with a love for science. My future science blog posts will cover a range of topics in the biology/chemistry fields.

Thank you for your continued support of my work! I appreciate all those who follow me (and those who don't too).


Sort:  

I agree with the data and agree with your stance on the freedom of choice. I think if we looked at the dangers of alcohol it would make marijuana look like a saint. In relation to this post, when I did a month of psychiatry most of the physicians agreed with this data. I think you would also be interested in a condition called cannabinoid hyperemesis. I have seen it a few times and it is essentially a condition that causes cyclic vomiting when a chronic marijuana user stops smoking. Weird thing is that hot showers making it better is a big clinical sign. Important to note that this does not happen in most people but it is still out there and real.

I will read into cannabinoid hyperemesis, the symptoms sound so strange (I wouldn't expect that to happen) that it definitely interests me! I always enjoy and appreciate your comments @tfeldman!

It is weird. We don't understand it well. I had never heard about it in my first two years but, clinically, many ER and hospitalists taught me about it. The literature is out there. Cheers.

Yes without a doubt alcohol is much worse! The hyperemesis thing is interesting. Never come across that. Suggests some kind of disruption to endocannabinoids in these individuals - hot shower sign is weird also:)

Clinically it is strange. I have asked the "hot shower sign" question in all that I expected. The diagnosis has been made in probably 5 or 6 patients I did a history/physical on and I would say about 4 of those individuals looked at me like I was a mind reader when I asked the shower question haha. It is like they are driven to a hot shower.

This is definitely not something to be concerned about. I'm glad you made yourself very clear about your support for cannabis as you well understand how demonized the plant has been.

We're probably a year or two out before researchers come to realize that the plant may in fact be used as an Anti-psychotic. The teensy amount of connection here to psychosis or schizophrenia should not be considered a harm or a setback in the world of medicine. After all, oncologists treat cancer with Mustard Gas... Err, Chemo, I mean. So the likelihood of a pant herb with 2000 years of shamanic use and almost zero toxicity, being used as a mental health drug is entirely plausible... actually, it's downright SANE!

Thank you for sharing this incredible article! I'm going to share out to my LinkedIn groups. Please accept the following.
https://steemit.com/steemit/@frankbacon/frank-bacon-why-cannabis

Thank you! I am glad you enjoyed it, it's my goal to be informative and still a bit entertaining.

I try my best to report the science as I read it, and explain it in such a way to allow others to make their own decisions about. That said I also make clear when I am expressing my opinions and try to make sure people know what they are. I think too often people try to sneak their opinions into things as facts, I want facts to be facts. :)

This post has been ranked within the top 25 most undervalued posts in the first half of Jan 28. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $10.53 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jan 28 - Part I. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

I am always glad to see scientists getting to their results, but also underlining the limitations of their own studies.

Here at the end, there is an increase in the rate, but not necessarily drastic enough to be worried or to change anything. I 100% with your conclusions! ;)

Indeed, this information could be useful in certain cases like for health professionals advising people with a genetic predisposition to psychosis. However for the average person it's something to note, understand and file away. Not concern over. :)

Thanks for taking the time to read and comment @lemouth. Always appreciated.

This is an example of science being way behind common sense. Go to Amsterdam, smoke the strongest weed you can find all day every day. After a week you'll almost certainly be exhibiting symptoms associated with 'schizophrenia'.

Thanks for reading and your comment.

wow, wow, wow, lush marijuana leaves. such as cannabis Aceh. unfortunately in our place, in Aceh banned by the Indonesian government.

In due time it will likely be made legal there as well. Thanks for reading and commenting, it is most appreciated!

Great post! I think most of us have been aware of the association as it has been suggested for quite some time. Of interest is the varying properties of different cannabinoids, for example CBD is known to be anti-psychotic whereas THC is pro-psychotic. This would suggest that different strains do have some effect on these things and that it might be possible that some could be safer in this regard than others.

https://twitter.com/Soul_Eater_43/status/825336200349249536

Indeed, it would seem that studying the effects of different strains would be worthwhile. Or at least pinpointing down what canabanoids are specifically at fault so strains lower in those compounds could be grown for recreational and medicinal users.

I'm sure it will happen if the governments can just stop the hysterical responses that limit research.

Great review, thank you. The amazing, but also challenging thing with cannabis is that a plant like hemp with little to no THC, but a ton of CBD (treat anxiety, panic .......can occasionally happen with THC edibles for example) is put in the category as cannabis with 25% THC and no CBD..........very different affect for most people.

Check out this

It is a great example how the desired effect (Even from the people running the study) want to "discover."

Various canabanoids have shown medicinal potential the only thing holding things back are a few archaic laws. Let the scientists freely do their work and determine precise dosages and applications for any that might be beneficial. IMO.

It appears to me that these legal issues won't be around much longer anyway though.

There are no legal issues in the US when it comes to hemp and the only difference with hemp is it contains <0.3% THC.........so research away. Take a look at our homepage at the bottom that relates treatable health problems and current research/studies associated with the claims.

And thank you for reading and commenting! :)

Edit Round 1: Corrected word choice/spelling
Edit Round 2: the second half of a sentence got lost in my initial pruning prior to posting. It's back now.
Edit Round 3: Added in a link to a previous post, and a brief discussion of codons for clarity of a point.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.30
TRX 0.12
JST 0.033
BTC 64534.17
ETH 3150.15
USDT 1.00
SBD 4.01