You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
RE: Horizon Drop: The Easiest, Most Definitive Way to Prove the Curvature of the Earth
Gyroscope: Demonstrate this, then, and explore alternate explanations that might refute it in order to strengthen your case.
The surface speed of the earth varies from the poles to the equator, but remains one revolution per 24 hours, and your location on the surface riding along with it means your frame of reference is apparently stationary. If a juggler rides on a maglev train at 60 mph, he doesn't need to compensate for the velocity because the train, his body, and the balls he juggles are all moving within the same frame of reference. There is no vibration from outside interference just like the Earth.
he would if it was turning around a corner. everyone has felt it. same when in a plane. all seems normal until you ascend/descend or bank.
they are called g-forces if you turn hard enough.
on the earth, you'd constantly be turning a corner.. so no, it is not straight and linear as in your description of the juggler.
Except no, you're not "constantly turning a corner" in the sense of your analogy. You're rotating at one revolution per day. That's imperceptible even at the equator because everything is also rotating at the same rate.
That is your conjecture. It doesn't matter that it is the same rate. Merry go rounds are felt at low speeds.
Then gyroscopes... it really is the archilles heel of the globe earth theory.
Sit on a merry-go-round at 1 rev/day. You won't notice it.
hahahahahahahah... yeah, ok, what kind of merry-go-round where you on. because it is worse on the edge.
and gyroscopes.. none of you will touch it, because IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE ON A GLOBE EARTH.
we are not moving. oh, well, i don't believe you truly believe what you say.
Gyroscopes do show the earth moving. They confirm the rotation of the earth.
now you are just flat out lying, why do you do this? I've shown you multiple videos, never once have you refuted it, all you've done is point the the pendulum. now suddenly, it is true.
new strategy for disinformation?