Physicists create fluid with ‘negative mass’
From Gephardt Daily
A team of physicists at Washington State University have created a fluid that ignores Isaac Newton‘s Second Law of Motion. The fluid has “negative mass.” When it’s pushed it accelerates backwards.http://gephardtdaily.com/national-international/physicists-create-fluid-with-negative-mass/Almost all matter in the universe obey’s Newton’s second law — matter accelerates in the direction of the force applied to it. The new fluid does the opposite.
“With negative mass, if you push something, it accelerates toward you,” Michael Forbes, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Washington State, said in a news release.
The liquid consists of rubidium atoms cooled to a temperature barely greater than absolute zero. The cooled atoms formed a Bose-Einstein condensate, a phase of matter characterized by slow-moving particles that behave like waves. The matter behaves like a superfluid, meaning its particles move in unison without sacrificing energy.
Researchers used lasers to cool the liquid in a tiny bowl. When scientists broke the bowl, the rubidium atoms rushed outwards. Scientists applied a second set of lasers to alter the spin of the out-rushing atoms. As a result, the atoms took on negative mass.
“Once you push, it accelerates backwards,” said Forbes. “It looks like the rubidium hits an invisible wall.”
Follow @contentjunkie to stay up to date on more great posts like this one.
From my understanding of the situation, it isn't that the rubidium takes on a negative mass, rather that is behaves in an anomalous fashion while still actually having mass. The title of the source article is a bit of a misnomer
Correct. In fact, they created negative virtual inertial mass. It is negative because it seems to oppose the Newton's 2nd Law and virtual because it is not the real mass of the rubidium atoms. In fact it has to do with the manipulation of the spin-orbit coupling. That's how the manage to create some strange phenomena above certain limits.
Everything you k-Newton was wrong!
(huehuehue)
This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Apr 18. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $1.36 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.
See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Apr 18 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.
If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.