It’s Official: European Scientific Journal Concludes 9/11 was a Controlled Demolition

in #science7 years ago (edited)

In case you've missed it:

15-years after the attacks on September 11th, the European Scientific Journal, a publication of the European Scientific Institute (ESI), published an article titled “15 Years Later: On the Physics of High-Rise Building Collapses,” in which they analyze the collapse of all three World Trade Center buildings. The results of their findings continue to indicate that the WTC towers were destroyed by controlled demolition, and the fact that this controversial topic was covered by a publication that boasts an editorial committee from reputable colleges and universities around the world (despite the article’s disclaimer), can be considered yet another small victory for 9/11 Truthers.

The study was written in collaboration by Steven Jones of Brigham Young University (now retired), Robert Korol of McMaster University – a Mechanical Design Engineer in the aerospace industry, Anthony Szamboti, and Ted Walter of Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth. The highly-sourced study breaks down the scientific evidence while revealing the discrepancies in NIST’s official report, and we suggest our readers – especially the skeptics – read it in its entirety.

One of the most important testimonies on the collapse of the World Trade Towers that was brought to attention in the study comes from the head structural engineer of the towers, John Skilling. It is apparently not enough for skeptics to take the findings of thousands of architects and engineers seriously, but should a skeptic choose not to at least consider the expertise of one of the men who built the WTC towers, then they are purposefully remaining blind.

Every sort of catastrophe that can happen to a high-rise building has to be taken into consideration during the design and construction processes, including the impact of an airplane. According to a 1993 report from The Seattle Times, the Trade Towers were analyzed years ago, after concern was raised over a case where an airplane hit the Empire State Building. It was concluded at the time that the Trade Towers could withstand the impact of a Boeing 707.

In a statement made to The Seattle Times by Skilling:

“We looked at every possible thing we could think of that could happen to the buildings, even to the extent of an airplane hitting the side, however back in those days people didn’t think about terrorists very much.” He continues, “Our analysis indicated the biggest problem would be the fact that all the fuel (from the airplane) would dump into the building. There would be a horrendous fire. A lot of people would be killed. The building structure would still be there. However, I’m not saying that properly applied explosives – shaped explosives – of that magnitude could not do a tremendous amount of damage. I would imagine that if you took the top expert in that type of work and gave him the assignment of bringing these buildings down with explosives, I would bet that he could do it.”

As stated in the study: “In other words, Skilling believed the only mechanism that could bring down the Twin Towers was controlled demolition.” It should be pointed out, as well, that a steel-framed high-rise building has never completely collapsed from fire. And yet on September 11, 2001, three buildings supposedly collapsed in this manner, one of which wasn’t even hit by a plane.

It was on this latter point that the authors concluded their study. They state:

“It bears repeating that fires have never caused the total collapse of a steel-framed high-rise before or since 9/11. Did we witness an unprecedented event three separate times on September 11, 2001? The NIST reports, which attempted to support that unlikely conclusion, fail to persuade a growing number of architects, engineers, and scientists.”

Read more:

Do you like our independent news and content and want to support unbiased, global news? Then please follow us! Thank you.

This article is shared from our official site http://anonymous-news.com/european-scientific-journal-concludes-911-was-a-controlled-demolition/

You can also donate to us, every donation, no matter how small, is kindly appreciated. Thank you very much.

Here are our wallet addresses you can donate to :

Bitcoin: 17keMxjCg47YwZtrXbcvgPfrotPwWB9GBT

Dogecoin: DUCxWVRpvRCVEJ5cMznfhTyY7h4bMDU9ET

Ethereum: 0x248f1f8bd04831f42b939050383312272ee7b586

Litecoin: LXRpRGyiTAHGfqkzfSENuwddNBTMCErgpB

DASH: XxQJWjNdPd2QTjZRnFJivUSDbgp4dTNXfg

Namecoin: NHRczqv5FRz2kexeFhqrGew552gTUmL4DD

Peercoin: PLjQ9v3yKENTbSbKU1CiG8fdpHpy9aaw7N

Vertcoin: VjU8Tec32GPSUW3BuWa7xyK4fyj3s2Fokv

The DAO: 0xa2d8e97653f1d25ec46cf9781f29716e4da01400

Monero:456EEsoT2gmVaG6j1syt6ZRcC4Ef8PfioMf5ywoKbSrLSiGcJHMc6PVNFhvx3iZPSoK9VxgGhuMXYg2kkHhLkgfu83GKsTg

Thank you.

Sort:  

This has been obvious since about 2002, and we saw Building 7 announced as having fallen on tv news, when in the background, it was still standing. (brit tv I believe)
Which indicated to me, this was a coordinated intelligence machine involved.

Releasing news minutes after the planes hit the first tower; videos of the plane, and not releasing other video of the Pentagon. Squelching news that could prove or disprove.

I guess the last straw was finding THERMATE all over the surrounding buildings; that was a clue as well.. STEEL HAS TO BE MELTED at thousands of degrees to get it to fall. Military grade Thermate was used to bring those buildings down, in a remote controlled demolition that took months of late nights by those who planted the explosives.

All of this is very well documented on youtube. Deep state did not plan on social media pinning the finger back to them, but times have changed since JFK, MLK, etc.

Deep state is the correct catchword here. And money. It's always about money. Just follow back the trails of money and you'll find the culprit.

like Lucky Larry Silverstein who had just months before taken a 99 year lease on the buildings and land, and transferred the insurance to mostly-wait for it- German insurance companies, and the amount of insurance was double what the buildings had been appraised for, but the insurance cases went to court and were paid out. He invested a few million in cash up front and was paid 4 billion.
Same person who made the infamous statement '"....the decision was made to pull it..." referring to Bldg 7 that was not hit by any plane or plane parts for that matter, but which housed all the Enron investigation materials on a floor that mysteriously burned for hours before it was "pulled".

Greatly said Surfyogi. I think anyone with basic common sense could see that 9/11 was an inside job. No buildings ever in the history of the world have collapsed in to dust at free fall speed due to fire, which there was only fire in the upper floors. except when they started blowing up the under infrastructure. all building fires of similar type , some burning for days at a time the buildings were still left standing, and they expected people to believe that after just 45 mins of being on fire that they collapsed into dust at free fall speed!!! what a joke!!! and building 7, like Binksmom mentioned, clearly that was demolition, looking identical to all building demos. I could rant and rave forever about things, but I think we all know what happened, except for the brainwashed sheep who actually believe that it was a terrorist attack. Great stuff guys, just wanted to hop in for a few. Followed and upvoted. best of luck.

I upvoted and resteemed this, I will not be satisfied until everyone on the planet knows of this crime

Thank you. Everbody has to know about this.

I agree. There are many people who do not want to know, too much cognitive dissonance to even take a peek. "my country wouldn't really kill 3 thousand people!"

"Regarding the recent developments on social media, we would like to inform the public that neither the European Scientific Journal, ESJ, nor the European Scientific Institute, ESI have published content on 9/11 attacks."

source: http://www.eujournal.org/files/journals/1/documents/Disclaimer.ESJ.pdf

There's a fantastic documentary about this called 'zeitgeist' on Netflix.

If you enjoyed this comment, please Upvote, Resteem and follow me @hotandrandom

yes Zeitgeist was an awesome film!! I remember when it first came out! that and also the Loose Change films, the best one Loose Change Final Cut. Also there was the Martial Law films. I think those 3 were the best films about the topic. followed and upvoted!!

Building 7 was the smoking gun for me when I began to look into it.

Always question everything!

Upvoted&Resteemed!

James Corbett has done some fantastic work investigating the 9/11 Suspects

This post has been ranked within the top 80 most undervalued posts in the second half of Jun 17. We estimate that this post is undervalued by $18.56 as compared to a scenario in which every voter had an equal say.

See the full rankings and details in The Daily Tribune: Jun 17 - Part II. You can also read about some of our methodology, data analysis and technical details in our initial post.

If you are the author and would prefer not to receive these comments, simply reply "Stop" to this comment.

Coin Marketplace

STEEM 0.18
TRX 0.15
JST 0.029
BTC 63235.53
ETH 2558.76
USDT 1.00
SBD 2.63