Which One Of These Should Be The RUNCOIN Logo?
After carefully evaluating the status of RUNCOIN, I decided it's time to create a logo for it. But, to be honest, I'm not very sure which one should I use. So, I'm asking for your opinion:
Please respond in the comments with 1, 2 or 3, 1 being the topmost icon in this post.
Much appreciated :)
I'm a serial entrepreneur, blogger and ultrarunner. You can find me mainly on my blog at Dragos Roua where I write about productivity, business, relationships and running. Here on Steemit you may stay updated by following me @dragosroua.
https://steemit.com/~witnesses
If you're new to Steemit, you may find these articles relevant (that's also part of my witness activity to support new members of the platform):
I like them in this order 3, 2, 1. Here's why, but these are simply my personal perceptions of them ;)
I prefer the 3rd one because it's in a minimalist style and suggests running as a sport.
The second it's ok too but feels too complicated and more like a dancer than a runner.
And the first one gives me the feeling of an exit signpost, like someone running away from something, not a good vibe.
So I vote for no. 3 :)
Thanks :)
I like first one as RUN coin logo...
thanks!
Love the first one with the flat design and all, the other two seems too 2001-ish.
Anyway, I wonder how do you make cryptotoken and publish them in open ledger dex @dragosroua ? Hopefully you can make a post about it someday, cause I also wants to create an ICO to fundraise one of my venture, but I haven't got any idea how to do so.
dully noted, I will try to make room for a post like that. thanks for the input.
Awesome, looking forward to it, you're the mvp @dragosroua !
My order would be:
1 - this is simple. It will work in many installations, from business cards to websites to t-shirts, to listing on an exchange. It is nicely identifiable. I don't have to think to know what it is about.
3 - this is a nice stylized logo, but I'm not sure what the crescent represents. When you make this much smaller as on a listing page on an exchange, I think it will not be bold enough to be recognizable
2 - this is a bit too busy / abstract to be easily identifiable as a runner. Again, when this is made smaller you lose all sense of what it is representing.
Just my thought on this - keep the logo as simple as you can. You want it to be identifiable without thought, or squinting to see it better.
Think of the Nike tick - very simple, works everywhere, adaptable.
I want a logo that also looks good on a shirt so I can wear my RUNCOIN shirt when I'm out running and let everyone know - I get paid to run! hehehehe
Thanks a lot, really appreciate your thoughts, Trevor :)
No problem :-)
I'm as interested to see where this goes as you are :-)
My favoruite one is probably the first one. Really simple and minamilsotic and something easy on the eyes.
The other ones I don't know why make me think of some branding on some sports healthy cereal bar.
All of them are great designs nonetheless
I like 1, 3, then 2.
1 seems like the most professional of the three. The circle is simple and easy on the eyes. The runner is the exit-runner that we already know and love. The logo is familiar, professional, and easily identifiable. A could be said that it's too derivative though.
2 is a little too abstract for my taste. Also, gradients shouldn't be used on logos.
3 seems a little off for some reason. Like it's skewed or the proportions are slightly off. I think it's just an optical trick, but it's less appealing than the circle to me.
I like the first one best.
For what it is worth, and I do not claim to be anything more than just a basic and simple soul, I like number 1 best because it is clear and simple. Like me.
1 > 3 > 2
Number 2 looks like the logo for the running event of a 80 or 90 olympics
Number 3 looks like something nike would have printed.
Number one looke more formal and coin like
i love the second one. Very good!